Buyers Pissed Off With Copy Protection? Pretend It Was A Mistake
from the sense-a-pattern? dept
It looks like the entertainment industry has a new strategy for dealing with situations where consumers get seriously pissed off about new copy protection technology: they pretend it was all a "mistake." That's what TiVo claimed when their copy protection wouldn't let some customers save shows for an indefinite period of time. The latest was that about a week ago the band Switchfoot got a lot of publicity for having a member of the band put a post on the band's own forum apologizing for the copy protection and giving instructions on how to get around it. Having bands tell people how to get around copy protection is nothing new, but this one got a lot of extra attention for some reason. So much attention, in fact, that the label is now claiming the copy protection was a "mistake" and they're recalling the CD. Somehow, you get the feeling that if this didn't get so much press attention, it wouldn't have been a "mistake" at all. It's still not clear why these labels are putting this technology on CDs. If the idea is to prevent file sharing, that clearly isn't happening. All of these CDs still have songs on file sharing networks. The only purpose seems to be to make the actual buyers of the CD feel like criminals. Even more interesting, in this story, though, is that the original post with the band member apologizing and telling fans how to get around the copy protection has been removed from the Sony owned website. So, even though the label will give people new CDs that will let people make digital copies, they won't let anyone know how to do it with the existing "mistake" CDs. It seems like perhaps the only real "mistake" was that Sony wasn't monitoring the fan forums before letting content go up.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
more interesting still is DMCA violation by postin
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Boycott
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Boycott
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Boycott
http://www.allofmp3.com
Seems the comrades have different copyright laws. I don't think any of the money winds up going to the bands, but it doesn't go to the evil RIAA either, and (apparently) it is legal enough to keep you out of the big house.
If you knew about this, don't flame me. I just discovered it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]