Samsung's Goldilocks Flash Pricing Gets It In Trouble

from the regulation-via-fairy-tale dept

Thu, Oct 13th 2005 10:55am — Carlo Longino

These prices are too high: Samsung will pay a $300 million fine after pleading guilty to price fixing in the US, following government allegations it and two competitors (which have already pled guilty) conspired to fix the price of their chips between 1999 and 2002, citing a number of companies as victims, including Apple. These prices are too low: the plea and fine come a week after Korean authorities said they were looking in to investigating Samsung for setting prices of memory it sold to Apple too low. Apple reportedly secured some 40 percent of Samsung's quarterly flash memory output for the launch of the iPod nano, and there are allegations that the volume discount it got put prices at below-market rates. Times are a bit rough for Samsung, as its electronics business is expected to post another losing quarter Friday, while the Samsung Group, South Korea's largest conglomerate, deals with a number of scandals at home. What will it take for Samsung to get prices just right?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

4 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 13 Oct 2005 @ 1:02pm

No Subject Given
it will probably take a large group of hot blondes who go around screwing authority figures who r trying to get samsung in trouble.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Jorsett, 13 Oct 2005 @ 1:42pm

Strange
I find Samsung having revenue difficulties surprising. I've noticed that their products are what I've been buying lately. In the past couple of years I've bought two televisions and a computer monitor, whereas in years past I would probably have been buying Sony products. Samsung's pricing and feature set are great.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sohrab, 13 Oct 2005 @ 4:39pm

No Subject Given
A few samsung products including 2 tv's? Im sorry. Dont worry, I give you another year before you see why you should have kept to Sony and not sumsung. Sumsungs tv qualityes go down the tube after some usage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wetiowvut2b7565v7823tr89r67tr23q89v57348975qwfj, 14 Oct 2005 @ 12:34am

This article is a little confusing...
The 300$ million fine is for DRAM, which is differnt to the flash RAM they sold to apple
[ link to this | view in chronology ]