Sprint, Cable Companies Make It Official
from the creating-the-mecha-telco dept
Cable TV companies have been talking about offering mobile phone service for some time now, the rumors that a deal with Sprint would finally be announced gathered pace over the last couple weeks, finally culminating in the announcement that Sprint, Comcast, Time Warner Cable, Cox Communications and Advance/Newhouse are forming a joint venture to meld the companies' wired and wireless services. Much of the talk has been about how cable companies want to offer the "quadruple play" -- cable TV, internet, voice and mobile phone -- and expectations were that they'd just enter an MVNO arrangement with Sprint, and resell its service. While bundling has been a successful strategy for the cable companies, we've wondered just how valuable combining everything into one big bill really is. But today's announcement goes beyond bundling or the quadruple play, and is really about taking the triple play mobile that Mike's been talking about for more than a year. It's not just about bundling, it's about offering users anywhere, anytime access to all their services, whether it's at home through a cable pipe, or outside it on Sprint's mobile network. Customers will buy the bundled services from one company and have just a single point of contact, but the JV says it will give users access to all their services -- even DVR content -- from the mobile device. It's that kind of integration, not just bundling, that makes things far more exciting than just having everything on a single bill for consumers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
who cares
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Depend on the mobile to f*** it up
The real trick is to figure out how to get to the cable companies' pricing: one price for the service, with a premium for additional "layered" services. That is, one price for all calls local, mobile-to-mobile, and out-of-network... basic service. Then layer additional services, but at single prices:
The trick is to figure out the price point where consumers will be willing to purchase the various services, and no more "per unit" charges. Of course, the media companies (RIAA/MPAA) won't like this model, but they already put up with it with OnDemand type digital cable... why not mobile?
But as I said, the mobile operators aren't used to this model, and figure they can nickel and dime their customers for every song/video/block of internet activity. That's when somebody with brains comes along with a better pricing scenario and eats their lunch...!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]