New Dutch iPod Tax Proposal Slightly Less Obnoxious
from the mmm-bop-you-with-another-charge dept
The Netherlands has had a levy on blank media like CDs and DVDs for some time, similar to taxes in other countries collected to reimburse copyright holders for all the infringement that people buying the items are presumed to do. The group behnd the surcharge has been pushing for a similar tax on MP3 players and DVRs, and its initial proposal was a ludicrous 3.28 euro per gigabyte -- which would have added about $230 onto the price of the biggest iPod. Understandably, electronics manufacturers weren't happy, so the group has come back with a new proposal with a higher per-gigabyte fee, but a cap of 25 euros. These levies are pointless in many ways, both because they presume everyone that buys an MP3 player is a criminal, and they're also an attempt by record labels to now make money from technology they fought so hard against. Dutch trade groups are also pointing out that with more and more legitimate content being bought online, these "iPod taxes" end up making consumers pay copyright holders twice. If that's the case and the "price of piracy" is figured into the tax, shouldn't people then be free to copy whatever they want, since they've paid into the fund when they bought their blank CDs or MP3 player? After all, it's presumed that everyone's a pirate, and this is supposed to balance things out. But of course not -- because, remember, listening to music on the device of your choice is a privilege. The record labels have no problem making you pay for it, again and again.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Why do people put up with this?
And on and on and on...
Why the hell do we put up with all this?
The world is a slave to someone who makes a living selling Britney Spears songs? what the HELL is this..?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why do people put up with this?
Another problem is that people also have to pay for CDs or DVDs they use for e.g. backup of their data and to burn photo's on.
And last but not least, the organization has not been able to ever show where the money it collected has gone. There are now several petitions against the organization.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
1. A single is the same sing in three different colors (Radio edition, Disco edition) on the same disc
2. All Digital media gets DRM (sony?)
3. We pay tax on tax (Value of media then the price per GB and then we add BTW)
Where is the time you were advised to create back-ups?
I remeber a dos installation disk (ok, no music) which the manual ADVISED me to create back-ups and lock the original in safe.
Protecting your self is fine, but things can go overboard. Actually they have gone already.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]