Google Print Kills Children?
from the Great-Ormon-Street-hospital?-this-is-reality-calling... dept
The debate over Google's book scanning plan seems to get more ridiculous with each passing day. It seems like a lot of people on both sides of the argument haven't bothered to spend any time looking at the actual details of what Google is doing. However, leading the pack for ridiculousness is the claim from the Great Ormon Street Hospital that Google's Print project will undermine their efforts to save "seriously ill children." The hospital owns the rights to Peter Pan, and uses the money from royalties to fund research. This isn't the first time the hospital has gone nuts over the copyright, by the way. A few years ago they went after a woman who dared to write a derivative book based on the Peter Pan story. Just imagine what they would do if they were allowed to have a patent on the story? As for the Google Print situation, never mind the fact that you won't be able to read Peter Pan via Google Print and never mind the fact that it's designed to help more people find the book -- the hospital seems to think it needs to get paid any time anyone mentions Peter Pan, and they're not afraid to make you feel guilty for thinking otherwise. It's a classic "just think of the children" gambit. Have they started suing libraries for having Peter Pan in their card catalogs? Of course, if Google Print is going to destroy all those children's lives without actually letting anyone read the story, how come Project Gutenberg's version of Peter Pan hasn't driven the hospital out of business already? And, in the meantime, did anyone bother to let the hospital know that they can simply ask Google not to scan Peter Pan and all their "problems" would be solved?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
UMVU estimator
Common sense might tell us to take the average of the X's and multiply it by 2.
However, a more accurate estimate is to take the maximum value of X's, max(X), and multiply it by (N+1)/N. It can be mathematically proven that this is better.
But wow, a hospital owning rights to Peter Pan? That sounds like a statistic out of UMVU land.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I bet these are the fuckers responsible..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Google
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
WOW!!! That's a genius new advertising/flavour!
Peter Pan Peanut Butter
Google should donate some Jelly and Bread to that hospital - at least the children would not go hungry [sarcasm]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nothing to see here. Move along...
In other words: some fuckwit claiming to represent the hospital answered a reporter's question when he clearly didn't have a clue what was going on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
3 biggest lies
It's because of national security.
It's for your convenience.
How about a game? Any time someone says one of these to you, they get a head butt.
There are also two questions (automatically answered by a rowdy "Hell Yeah!") that deserve even more special consideration for the person who speaks them:
Are you calling me a liar?
Don't you trust me?
Anyone who utters either of those two gems has to live in a trailer park without a job (" 'Cause I hurt my back stocking shelves at the grocery store ten years ago"), and share the abode with an 18 year old named Tammy Sue who has three children by three different fathers. Oops, most of the people who say those magic phrases are already in that situation.
Marty
[ link to this | view in thread ]