Feds To RIM: We Got Your Back, Just Keep The Crackberries Running

from the can't-be-without-that-hit dept

Almost three years ago, when people started talking about how RIM could be forced to kill Blackberry service in the US over their patent dispute with NTP, the US Congress filed a brief in the case noting how much damage it would to the US government should their Blackberries stop working. Don't think they haven't been watching the situation closely for the last three years either. While you would think that would have given government officials enough time to work out a backup plan (especially now that there really are viable alternatives to the Blackberry), that's not the case. With the momentum clearly shifting back to NTP in the case, the Justice Department has filed a statement of interest which (reading between the lines) says something along the lines of: "Please, please, please, please, please do not force RIM to shut off Blackberry service in the US. We'd just die." Ah, yes, once again the government looks for ways to avoid patents when they're inconvenient.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    gattaca, 11 Nov 2005 @ 9:21pm

    Yeh, well . . .

    What dogmatic group declared blackberry THE solution for wireless handhelds???

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Nonesuch, 11 Nov 2005 @ 11:44pm

      Why Blackberry over other solutions?

      What dogmatic group declared blackberry THE solution for wireless handhelds???
      There are plenty of wireless handheld solutions, but Blackberry has the most popular approach for "push" email... most other solutions, the handheld has to actively poll for new messages every X minutes, or use some sort of hack like the IDLE command in IMAP4 used by SnapperMail, etc.

      Additionally, in a corporate environment Blackberry Enterprise Server (BES) is arguably the most stable and scalable solution for rolling out wireless email to hundreds or thousands of employees. Competitors like "Good" just aren't good enough.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        Mike (profile), 12 Nov 2005 @ 11:42am

        Re: Why Blackberry over other solutions?

        The question isn't why Blackberry over other solutions, but why not have a backup plan, clearly knowing that Blackberry may need to be shut off.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Mousky, 12 Nov 2005 @ 12:38pm

          Re: Why Blackberry over other solutions?

          You are overstating the impact of recent comments from the judge. Blackberry will not be shut off. It is not in NTP's interest to see an injunction. If Blackberry is shut off, then RIM would lose revenue, lots of it, which would make that huge windfall that NTP is looking for, less likely to happen. RIM will pay - and they know that. Most financial analysts are betting on a settlement of around $1 billion. Not a bad pay day for a company that makes no products and provides no services. Thank god for the patent system.

          Good read at Blackberry Surprise

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Mike (profile), 12 Nov 2005 @ 1:03pm

            Re: Why Blackberry over other solutions?

            No, I agree. There's no way it will be shut off (I think $1 billion is a bit high, but we'll see...). However, it's pretty clear that the gov't hasn't planned ahead in case it does happen -- which it absolutely could.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Mousky, 12 Nov 2005 @ 10:45pm

              Re: Why Blackberry over other solutions?

              Several analysts believe that the worst-case scenario for RIM is $1.5 billion. I read an "interesting" rant over at The Register that claimed that this was a David (NTP) versus Goliath (RIM) battle. Um, ya, RIM invests millions of dollars into a physical product and NTP invests zero into non-existant products and services. Gotta love patent blackmail. Why innovate when you can litigate?

              link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Stoned4Life, 12 Nov 2005 @ 9:09pm

          Re: Why Blackberry over other solutions?

          Since when has the government had a backup plan for anything??

          1. Create a Plan
          2. Execute the Plan
          3. Hope the plan works
          4. Pray the plan works
          5. Holy crap, the plan isn't working.
          6. OMG, what are we supposed to do??
          7. Turn to the judicial system and bend the law to suit your strongest and deepest desires... no, we're not legalizing child porn here.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Agitater, 12 Nov 2005 @ 2:00pm

    Feds To RIM: We Got Your Back, Just Keep The Crack

    . . . except that the U.S. Patent Office is has released its preliminary report stating that the NTP patent may not hold. The courts won't reverse a ruling against RIM based on a preliminary finding of the USPO, but logic dictates that if the USPO's own findings are now indicating a reversal the most likely winners in all of this will be the lawyers who counter-sure NTP when the USPO's final report favoring RIM is released (Two years from now? Three years?). Call Congress foolishly protective right now if you must, but the USPO has a hell of a lot to answer for because of reams of bad patents which been rescinded over the past ten years. The USPO is a rancid joke.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Agitater, 12 Nov 2005 @ 2:01pm

    Feds To RIM: We Got Your Back, Just Keep The Crack

    . . . except that the U.S. Patent Office has released its preliminary report stating that the NTP patent may not hold. The courts won't reverse a ruling against RIM based on a preliminary finding of the USPO, but logic dictates that if the USPO's own findings are now indicating a reversal the most likely winners in all of this will be the lawyers who counter-sue NTP when the USPO's final report favoring RIM is released (Two years from now? Three years?). Call Congress foolishly protective right now if you must, but the USPO has a hell of a lot to answer for because of reams of bad patents which been rescinded over the past ten years. The USPO is a rancid joke.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    dude, 14 Nov 2005 @ 7:04am

    RIM's stupidity is unbelievable

    As far as I remember, back in 2002 when RIM was
    first sued by NTP and the court found RIM guilty of patent infringement, they were ordered to pay
    *only* 23 million bucks in damages ...
    Yet RIM decided to fight that court decision and
    here we go - the meter is at 450 mil now (at least) and counting...
    Talking about stupidity...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.