And Then There Was One: Only One One-Click Patent
from the amazon-keeps-the-ring dept
Last year a company sued Amazon.com, claiming that Amazon's infamous one-click patent actually infringed on their own electronic transaction patent. A court has tossed out the suit, leaving Amazon.com as the one true holder of the one-click patent.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Am I the only one..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Am I the only one..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Am I the only one..
[See who's a butthead and place my order]
*click*
Jeff Bezos is a butthead!
[Place my order]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
well...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: well...
Amazon Sues Barnes & Noble Over One-Click Patent (1999)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
learn correct terminology
talking about patents and not knowing much about them...
First, a patent cannot infringe on somebody else's patent: only product can infringe on a patent, so the patent holder can sue for patent infringement.
There is a procedure called "interference", when two different patent applications claims the same subject matter. But this is all handled by the PTO: they are supposed to determine which patent is valid.
Second, as much as I hate Amazon.com and their patents myself, believe me, 1-click patent is actually a *good* patent when you compare it to a typical patent issued to e.g. MicroShit...
Yes, it is a *good* patent, despite all the hysteria. After all, Tim O'Reily issued an apology to Jeff Bezos for calling a boycott on amazon.com when the prior art search bounty failed to produce anything of importance...
[ link to this | view in thread ]