New Cybercrime Treaty To Open Dangerous Doors Concerning Online Jurisdiction

from the the-long-arm-of-the-law dept

A common theme around here for years has been how questions involving jurisdiction on the internet are mostly ignored by governments leading to inconsistent rulemaking and leaving plenty of questions up in the air -- and, leaving open the very real possibility that people, companies and governments can simply find ways to use the absolute worst laws to prosecute people in other countries. A new "cybercrime treaty" being prepared by the US and a number of other countries appears to make the situation a lot worse. The idea behind the treaty is for authorities in various countries to share data back and forth to help track down cyber criminals. You can understand the reasoning -- since so much cybercrime is international, it would help to have such a treaty to team up to track down the worst offenders. The problem is that the treaty doesn't include "dual criminality" -- which would mean the treaty only covers things that are illegal in both countries. Instead, it will cover things that are illegal in just one country. That means that if someone in the US does something illegal elsewhere, authorities there could use this treaty to track them down in the US. Yes, even if they haven't committed a crime here. That basically sets the worst of the jurisdictional setups into law.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Rick, 28 Nov 2005 @ 11:01am

    Not in the US

    This will never happen, not in the current political climate of the US. While our law enforcement relishes at the idea, our leaders are not going to allow other countries to openly track and monitor US citizens for what THEY consider cyber crimes in their countries.

    It's the same reason the US renounced the war crimes treaty in 2002. Picture how many countries would love to prosecute US presidents for whatever THEY deem a crime?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Scott, 28 Nov 2005 @ 11:22am

    Re: Not in the US

    Our leaders will do whatever increases their own standing and power. Keep in mind that the people highest up on the chain did not want to be held accountable to the War Crimes treaty, lowly peon citizens are of no concern. My middle class world is unimportant to washington unless they somehow overlap.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    Mike (profile), 28 Nov 2005 @ 11:25am

    Re: Not in the US

    This will never happen, not in the current political climate of the US. While our law enforcement relishes at the idea, our leaders are not going to allow other countries to openly track and monitor US citizens for what THEY consider cyber crimes in their countries.

    The article indicates otherwise... It says that US politicians have rejected adding language to make this clear, complaining that it would make the treaty too "rigid."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Philip, 28 Nov 2005 @ 11:27am

    Dead cows

    For some reason, when reading this I just immediately thought of a US based website showing pictures of slaughtered cows and the Indian government attempting to come into US lands to arrest them.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Philip, 28 Nov 2005 @ 11:35am

    Re: Not in the US

    I thought it was the US that was initiating this? I can see that cause you just know that the US legislation wants to go after spammers and piraters overseas, notably in places where there aren't current laws against those things.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Damon, 28 Nov 2005 @ 1:51pm

    Are you kidding?

    If the crime is big enough that they would spend the time and manpower to come to the US to arrest someone, I say the person is getting what they deserve. I doubt they are going to come after teh idiot that accidentally sells a product that is not supposed to be imported, like an Ipod or something. They aren't going to waste thousands for a single misdimeanor. They are going to go after the pedophiles and drug dealers and kiddy porn rings.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.