Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

1. 

   Philip, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:01am

   
   

   My reasons

   It's not that I don't care; it's the "lag" of the video that doesn't give it a real time feel. If I cannot read their lips while talking to them, then it's pointless for me.
   Until video can come across lines as quickly as traditional voice, it won't become main stream.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

2. 

   topgun, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:08am

   
   

   computers

   if you want to see someone, get a webcam and some sort of video conference program and use that. generaly they are free.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

3. 

   Anonymous Coward, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:11am

   
   

   No Subject Given

   iChat and the new iMac make video calling a breeze. Works perfect every time.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

4. 

   Stephen Tillman, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:15am

   
   

   No Subject Given

   I can only see three applications to which these vid-phones may apply:
   1) the situation of a grandparent being able to see, and say hi to, a grandchild who lives hundres of miles away... and do so in "real time";
   2)Business conferences... but then again, those work just as well with voice-only systems;
   3)something for soldiers over-seas to be able to see and be seen by loved ones in (again) "real time".
   Sounds like a whole lot 'o niche marketing to me. Then again, would any "Vid-Phone Cafe" work? Would there be enough demand for the service to justify opening a store for people to come in and use these things? How about a mobile service? "We'll bring the phones in and let you use them". What about the other side of the call? Do they have a vid-phone to see your call?
   Nah... I think until we get to the point of Star-Trek-like display screens and true real-time communications, there's just not going to be any demand for these.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

5. 

   stizz, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:16am

   
   

   I want one

   My Moto V551 has a measly 5 MB's of storage. I did not realize this when I bought the phone even though the fact that it played 3gp files was a major factor in the purchase.
   I want a phone that plays and records video. Especially now that I can buy TV shows from apple.
   I can find plenty of video clipage on the web too. www.onegoodmove.org anb www.crooksandliars.com always have great video clips that I can easily convert with quicktime pro and then dump them on my phone. I can even locate older television shows (like old sesame street for my kid) via IRC through www.dejatoons.net
   When my toddler starts melting down, I hand him my phone and seconds later hes chill watching Cookie Monster eat the letter of the day.
   If I can find a model of phone that has decent sized screen and swappable memeory with ipod style mp3 and mpeg-4 playback, I would buy it in a hot second. I do not think I am alone on this.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

6. 

   pervert, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:17am

   
   

   Re: No Subject Given

   Well, there is always the wierdo who cant afford internet access beyond dial up and prefers sex hotlines over internet porn, the addition of video phones could revolutionize that industry and satisfy some lower budget porn addicts.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

7. 

   stizz, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:20am

   
   

   No Subject Given

   my rant forgot to include the mention that I did not reallt RTFA

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

8. 

   dan, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:47am

   
   

   No Subject Given

   I took an embedded systems design graduate class at my university last spring and our project was to design a cellular phone that would be able to be used to transmit/recieve video for video conferencing (not the actual production design, but the spec-ing of the components and some low level design work).
   
   The whole time, all I could think was who the heck wants a video cell phone? Apparently, nobody does.
   
   Oh, well got an A anyways.

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

9. 

   vap, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:55am

   
   

   Re: No Subject Given

   umm I care about video phones and I cant wait till they are main stream

   [ link to this | view in thread ]

10. 

    The Other Mike, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:55am

    
    

    No Subject Given

    As has been mentioned - give me a stable and consistent real time every time video connection and i will give you my dollars. people aren't interested in half develped systems, not that they aren't interested period. I would prefer video phones to voice only phones, but not the ones with 2 second video lag or the choppy webcam slideshow, and not the ones that only work with one in 20 phone calls on a sunny day in a major city with no solar flares on a chinese holiday with NASA computers doing the work.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

11. 

    KerryG, 2 Dec 2005 @ 9:56am

    
    

    For the love of video

    Just like most UberGeeks, with my stunning good looks, winning smile, and perfect hair, of course I want people to see me right when I wake up or after a long day at work. I get enough "face time" with clients, I don't need anymore. More often, I am trying to move clients away from calling me and using IM or email instead so I don't need some cooked up reason to go back to real time conversations for 99% of my communications.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

12. 

    shnot, 2 Dec 2005 @ 10:15am

    
    

    cell phone porn

    Hahaha, what's the obsession? $$$ I don't need a phone that can record video...that's why I bought a handycam. I've seen the video that you get from phones, it's decent if you're just recording your friend pulling somoenes pants down, but beyond that...i'll stick with my handycam. besides the bleh quality, it's a bit more difficult for someone to steal videos of me getting a bj from my handycam than it would be to take said videos from a cell phone. no thanks.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

13. 

    Jeremiah, 2 Dec 2005 @ 12:01pm

    
    

    maybe not the best comparison....

    Nobody cared about Beta vs. VHS, either. Pr0n was most certainly the deciding influence in that contest.
    
    If people decide they want pr0n on mobile phones, by God they'll have mobile phones with video so they can get their pr0n.
    
    
    Mmmmmm, pr0n.....

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

14. 

    Joe Schmoe, 2 Dec 2005 @ 12:04pm

    
    

    No Subject Given

    Tell why I should get excited [again] about another overpriced "feature" that's use is locked down and is not compatible across networks?

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

15. 

    BIGJ, 2 Dec 2005 @ 12:23pm

    
    

    video phones

    totally agree. Why in the world would I want a video phone. When I answer the phone at night I sure don't want someone looking at my ugly mug.
    J

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

16. 

    MLO, 2 Dec 2005 @ 12:35pm

    
    

    No Subject Given

    I never understood the whole multipurpose cell phone thing. Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I use my cell for calls. Period. And for urgent ones at that; I don't spend my train transit yakking on my phone.
    
    MLO

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

17. 

    Pervert Advocate, 2 Dec 2005 @ 12:44pm

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    That's right. Perverts need the action, too! Video conferencing with sex lines should be enough reason to buy the vidPhones.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

18. 

    Techno Geek, 2 Dec 2005 @ 12:49pm

    
    

    I agree

    Who would want to see another person during a phone call. I see no real reason for it. The only time a video phone would be valuable would be for troops overseas who would like to see family which would boost moral.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

19. 

    Rojosail, 2 Dec 2005 @ 1:00pm

    
    

    No Subject Given

    Has anyone tried Logitech's VideoCall?
    I found it to be pretty good with very low latency. Great picture and audio quality.
    

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

20. 

    BioBeing, 2 Dec 2005 @ 1:13pm

    
    

    I care

    I live in the States; my parents live in the UK. We are currently trying to set up WebCams so they can see my kids as we talk. There is a market for this!
    
    VideoCall gave us good picture but lousy audio - kept dropping. SightSpeed was good audio and so-so video. Just downloaded Skype 2.0 beta to try this weekend.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

21. 

    Stephen Tillman, 2 Dec 2005 @ 2:06pm

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    Multi-purpose phones:
    A bit off-topic, but oh well. The purpose of MP Phones (or, Smart Phones, as I've heard them called) was to combine a phone and a PDA. One less thing for us business geeks to carry around. I swear, all I need is a bottle of Bat Shark-Repellant and my utility belt will be ready for crimefighting, what with all the things I keep strapped to me.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

22. 

    Page, 3 Dec 2005 @ 8:05am

    
    

    Re: No Subject Given

    about 80% of South African internet users still use dialup...vidphones won't 'revolutionize' anything, it would just be something added on that hardly ever works as expected and remains a toy for those that can afford it.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

23. 

    Yehuda, 3 Dec 2005 @ 11:43pm

    
    

    Video phones

    Maybe because is the real world, we can actually do other things while we are talking on the phone (multitask). With video phones, you lose that capability.
    
    Video phones seem like they would be useful for three things: introducing new team members at work, seeing your grandchildren, and porn.

    [ link to this | view in thread ]

24. 

    Kat o Nine Tales, 4 Dec 2005 @ 11:05am

    
    

    Re: computers

    Topgun has it. My friends who've PCSed to South Korea are using Lingo phones so they have a line back here... but now they only use them to talk to those family members who don't use the internet much. The rest of us got webcams with built-in mics --and I've found that though the VoIP phones don't carry a noticeable delay, if I have an open phone line and an open conference channel (we were trying to set up the cams at the time), the voice comes over the computer speakers slightly before it comes through the phone line (with them on VoIP and me on a cell phone).

    [ link to this | view in thread ]