Virgin About To Become Quite Experienced In Four Play

from the virgin-mergin' dept

It can sometimes be difficult to follow the British communications industry through all of its mergers and spinoffs (though, to be fair, the US is no different at times). There really isn't a major "convergence" play, following various spinoffs from the most obvious choices -- leaving just about everyone without a core piece of the puzzle. However, a new one has just entered the game. Big cable firm NTL, with the ink barely dry from announcing plans to buy cable competitor Telewest, is expected to announce a merger with Richard Branson's Virgin Mobile. The new operation will take on the highly recognizable Virgin name -- and suddenly be able to offer "the big four" services: voice, video, broadband and wireless. Amusingly, NTL had already been using the Virgin brand, as they had picked up the Virgin.net ISP a while ago. Still, there's one reason to be a little skeptical about this deal. While everyone talks about the four different services as if they're all equal contributors, that's not at all true. The core of a true "four play," "quadruple play," "grand slam" or whatever your favorite telco commentator calls it is simply mobile broadband. If you have true mobile broadband, you can offer all four things. The wireless component isn't a separate service, it's about making voice, video and broadband mobile -- and since video and voice can travel over true broadband networks... it's all about the mobile broadband component. That may be Virgin's weakest link, however. They're an MVNO (a mobile virtual network operator, for those of you showing up late to class). The actual network they use is owned by T-Mobile, who has said they're fine with continuing to offer service to the new entity, but that might not always be the case. After all, T-Mobile and Virgin haven't always seen eye-to-eye. T-Mobile used to own a 50% stake in Virgin, but after a number of legal disputes, eventually sold their half back to Virgin. If Virgin is relying on them to provide the key component to a true wireless broadband strategy, then they may be in a bit of trouble.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Chris, 5 Dec 2005 @ 6:47am

    Virgin Mobile?

    I thought Virgin Mobile used Sprint's network.

    *shrug*

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Carlo, 5 Dec 2005 @ 7:06am

    Re: Virgin Mobile?

    This refers to Virgin Mobile in the UK.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.