CNN: Pay Cable, Pay Online

from the a-la-carte's-only-good-when-they-have-the-salisbury-steak dept

CNN made the headlines itself back in May when it said it would make all the videos on its CNN.com site free, supported by ads. So there was a little confusion today when the network announced a paid online video service (covered in a wonderfully self-serving story on its own site), promising "live video streams". The likely, and understandable, interpretation to that is that CNN is finally offering live feeds of its networks online -- but that's far from the truth. The service offers four "pipes" of live video. A brief glance this afternoon had one pipe showing entertainment news, another with an unmoderated feed of a press conference on the upcoming World Baseball Classic, and the other two were entralling live shots of the White House and some group of trees in Roanoke, Virginia, where it's snowing. To be fair, the service also offers access to CNN's video archives, as well as all the clips available for free on the site without commercials, but it's doubtful that will cause much interest.

CNN's offering comes at an interesting time, given the debate over a la carte cable pricing. Most cable companies oppose it, as do cable networks -- they go from a situation where they're guaranteed lower payments across a high number of users to a situation where they're not guaranteed anything, and users won't even have a chance to stumble upon their channel. Advertising revenues will take a hit as well, because it's almost exclusively a subtractive move -- most networks only stand to lose viewers. So should a la carte move forward, there are likely to be more services like CNN's, and more featuring the actual TV broadcast content. It's sort of a curious position -- the networks are totally opposed to the idea of a la carte pricing, but would love to sell individual subscriptions to people to watch their content online.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Jeremiah, 5 Dec 2005 @ 1:59pm

    CNN?

    People watch CNN?? What is this "tele-vision" thing you speak of?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 5 Dec 2005 @ 3:15pm

      Re: CNN?

      haha what a boob...tele vision is a part of the car that u use to see behind when driving...u should read more.....i tested negative for iq

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Non-anonymous Coward, 5 Dec 2005 @ 4:34pm

    Tried it. Doesn't work. No support.

    The subject line just about says it all. I signed up for CNN's new live service, but cannot get it to work no matter how hard I tried. Two days of the 14-day trial period have passed since I asked for technical support assistance. I received one automated reply and another that clearly indicated my support request had not been read by the person(?) responding.

    The bottom line: So far, it's a rip-off. Caveat emptor.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Vele, 5 Dec 2005 @ 10:31pm

    beating the wrong drum

    I think you guys are beating the wrong drum here. Most people can reasonably handle a few choices, and are inevitable lazy. I think a combo of a la carte programming and a menu will give many cable channels a boost, but will also reshuffle the same money around. Some picky people will stick to 10-15 top channels, while others inevitably will go to a more streamlined menu (read bundle). You may really watch 10 channels, but you want an additional 10 available just in case s**t happens. So, I do think there's a model for the industry to try on their move to truly IPTV.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.