No One Willing To Pay Very Much For AOL

from the raise-your-prices dept

With all the rumors swirling around in the last few months about Google, Yahoo or Microsoft possibly buying AOL, we decided to purposely ignore the rumor that came out last night saying that Microsoft was close to a deal to team up for advertising. Until something is official, it's not really worth commenting on. However, what is worth commenting on is AOL's Richard Parsons' assertion that: "We are not interested in selling AOL." For those of you prone to taking execs like at their word, we figured we'd help out with our nifty translation service: Techdirt's "what they really mean." So, when Parsons says that "we are not interested in selling AOL," what he really means is "no one offered enough to us for AOL, and since it doesn't seem like anyone's going any higher yet (quick, bid now!) we may just have to do a partnership instead (unless you bid a lot more, quickly!)."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anarchy_Creator, 6 Dec 2005 @ 9:26pm

    No One Wants AOL

    Honestly, I myself wouldn't pay $10 bucks for AOL inc.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 6 Dec 2005 @ 10:37pm

      Re: No One Wants AOL

      id buy it for 10$, just to own it and strip all the ads out of aim and release it like that

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anarchy_Creator, 7 Dec 2005 @ 2:59am

    why

    But why?
    There's no money to be made without all the craptacular ads.
    You'd be taking a huge loss.
    You'd be better off inheriting AOL then opensourcing AIM. Whoever created AOL dies, you get AOL, you opensource AOL, Everyone wins.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Dr.Apathy, 7 Dec 2005 @ 12:10pm

      Re: why

      Seems to me that if you could buy AOL for ten dollars, then you could pretty much do pretty much anything with it. Just downsize your staff, and bring in a couple of new subscribers, and your expenses are covered. You coul open source AIM, hell, open source every software asset they own (winamp, icq, etc). It would make no difference.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Chris H, 7 Dec 2005 @ 5:12am

    No Subject Given

    If you own AOL stock I'd suggest selling. Verizon's new $15 768k DSL is starting to steal customers. I know of a few AOL users who have already made the switch. As word of mouth travels it will only get worse for AOL. Unless you're a total technofool (like my Grandmother) switching to a service that is always on, doesn't need a second phone line, is $8/month cheaper, and about 13 times faster is a no brainer.

    I might need to talk to my Grandmother again about putting effort into learning how to use a separate email and web client.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Riley, 7 Dec 2005 @ 7:06am

    No Subject Given

    This whole AOL thing was like a game of chicken where MS/Google/Yahoo were trying to get one of the other guys to pony up some serious money for the company by pretending they were interested. It would probably benefit MS most by taking away some Google revenue and boosting their search service to more respectable numbers, but AOL's business is in decline anyway and will quickly become irrelevant no matter who they sell or partner with.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.