New-fangled Journalism's Problem: Too Much Email

from the whatever-you-say dept

Email has proved a valuable tool for journalists, giving them an easy way to get in touch with and interview sources. But reporting via email's got its critics who say it's a "recipe for sterile journalism". It's fairly clear that there's a number of people in the world of journalism that aren't comfortable with technology, as evidenced by the medium's generally backwards view of the Internet. Many journalists like using email for interviews because it gives them backup when somebody claims to have been misquoted, but one professor objects to them on the basis that it's lazy, and not "old-fashioned shoe-leather reporting". Of course, old-school reporters don't need email to be lazy. Email offers plenty of benefits to journalists, but at the end of the day, it's just a tool like the telephone or even the trusty reporter's notebook. Used responsibly, it's quite valuable. But it never made anyone do shoddy work on its own.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Josh, 7 Dec 2005 @ 2:51pm

    it's not ludditism...

    I think the point of the prof's complaint is not merely that e-mail is bad because "in my day we used shoe leather and really talked to people, gaddummit!" His point is more specific and frankly valid: when you "interview" someone via email, they have time to consider what they say and potentially run it by their superiors -- what you get is drier and more like a press release. Talking to people in person or over the phone (or by IM, I suppose -- in "real time" in other words) is more spontaneous and gets you more scripted answers. Yes, e-mail is a tool, and a useful tool at that, but with every tool you have to know what it can't do, not just how it makes your life easer.
    jf

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Carlo, 7 Dec 2005 @ 4:19pm

      Re: it's not ludditism...

      I'm not sure that giving people time to consider their response to questions is always a bad thing, though, on the other hand.

      link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.