A Simple Explanation For Why Software Patents Are Dangerous
from the thank-you-Tim dept
We've been arguing about problems with patents -- and software patents, in particular -- for a long time, now. We've obviously paid a lot of attention to the RIM, NTP lawsuit. However, Tim Lee has just written up a great piece explaining exactly why software patents are extremely problematic. He points out how the RIM/NTP case has gone on for three years now, and there's still no definitive answer from the US Patent Office as to whether or not the patents are valid. That's a huge problem for any society that wants to encourage innovation. Imagine if every new piece of software that's developed will need to go through this five or six year process of waiting for the USPTO to determine if patents it may or may not have infringed on are valid. Think how that will grind innovation to a halt in this country.Tim highlights the obviousness problem in software patents -- noting that "prior art" isn't the right way to look at things, since many programmers faced with similar problems will come up with similar solutions. It's not because they're "stealing" each others' "inventions," but because they're figuring out the best way to solve the specific problem at hand: "Is this really how we want to run our software industry? Do we really want to require lawyers to inspect every line of computer code to make sure a programmer didn't accidentally "invent" something that some other company previously patented?... In effect, patents create a legal minefield for software developers simply trying to go about their business. Because the patent office gives out patents so promiscuously, the developer has no way of predicting when code he writes might run afoul of a somebody's patent. That means that even if he developed every line of code himself, without looking at anyone else's code, he still can't be sure that somebody won't come along and sue him for patent infringement." Tim expresses hope that the impending shutdown of our politicians' beloved Blackberries will cause them to rethink the patent system, but he's probably giving them too much credit. While they may ignore the court order to keep their Blackberries running, it's unlikely they'll think about the larger issues at all.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sigh
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]