Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

• 

  TJ, 16 Dec 2005 @ 4:50pm

  
  

  Silly

  Silly, retarded, stupid, etc, would be terms for the idea of letting a judge f*ck RIM (because he is tired of waiting) while the patent office, pathetically impotent and delusional as it is, declares that (NTP) the emperor has no clothes. Of course, behaving in ways that is absolutely against the public good and contrary to the FACTS seems to have nothing to do with this nimrod judge's rulings. He seems to rule for no reason other than that he is bored with the case. For a judge in a PATENT DISPUTE to declare that he won't wait on the PATENT OFFICE to make a ruling is sad, and shows just how out of touch this judge is.
  
  Since we can give some defendants the death penalty with obviously insufficient evidence, can we also give an ignorant judge the death penalty for completely ignoring the responsibilities of his office because he is impatient with the patent office and bored with the case? No? Why not?!
  

  [ link to this | view in chronology ]

  • 

    little guy, 17 Dec 2005 @ 5:21am

    
    

    Be careful when insulting US judge

    
    Hey, who the fuck are you to insult US judge ?
    Judges and juries are all we, little guys, have to protect us from the big evil guys.
    In this case, the judge was following the Law to
    the letter, isn't it what we all want ?
    His initial ruling back in 2002 (injunction for Crackberries) was upheld on appeal, by the way.
    

    [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Mousky, 17 Dec 2005 @ 10:54am

      
      

      Re: Be careful when insulting US judge

      His initial ruling back in 2002 (injunction for Crackberries) was upheld on appeal, by the way.

      And since then, the USPTO has rejected three patents and is leaning towards a final rejection on these three patents. Justice works both ways. If three of the five or six patents that RIM supposedly violated become invalid, what validity is their in the original ruling and appeal?

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]

    • 

      Mousky, 17 Dec 2005 @ 11:00am

      
      

      Re: Be careful when insulting US judge

      You are convicted of murder and said conviction is upheld on appeal and put in prison. New credible evidence surfaces after you are in prison that proves you are not guilty. Based on your post, it sounds like that you are stuck in prison, regardless of the new evidence, because the appeal court upheld the original decision. Sorry. Too bad. Go to jail.

      [ link to this | view in chronology ]