Senators Ignore Court After Court On Unconstitutionality Of Video Game Bans

from the it's-a-tough-pitch dept

Undeterred by the fact that case after case after case where judges point out that government bans on video game sales are unconstitutional, some US Senators are pushing forward with a federal version of a similar law that would fine store managers should their stores sell video games designated for mature audiences to kids. This has been talked about quite a bit, and whether or not you agree with it, just about every court to hear such a case has found it to be unconstitutional, Illinois and Michigan being the two most recent examples. It's tough to see how the federal law is any more likely to be found acceptable. Also, following the ridiculous outrage at a game (Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas) including hidden sex scenes, this law would have the FTC waste taxpayer money investigating "the prevalence of embedded inappropriate material not reflected in a game's rating." Remember, this was a case where a game whose main storyline involves all sorts of criminal activity and who already had a "M for Mature" rating, getting into all sorts of trouble for including some consensual sex scenes hidden away. Because our Senators can't handle such things, it appears that the FTC will now get to spend time hunting around for Easter Eggs in all sorts of video games. Does this mean Microsoft would need to reclassify old versions of Excel?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Sv, 19 Dec 2005 @ 1:41am

    Facts straight

    Unconstitutional is banning every video game in existence to anyone. Banning selling mature games to kids is not unconstitutional.

    Example: banning every drink in existence (cola? tea?) to anyone is unconstitutional. Banning selling vodka to kids is not unconstitional.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    John, 19 Dec 2005 @ 1:58am

    Re: Facts straight

    Funny. The courts (who sort of focus on this type of thing) seem to disagree with you. But, perhaps you're a Supreme Court Justice in disguise?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Scott, 19 Dec 2005 @ 6:13am

    Re: Facts straight

    Actually the courts disagreed because the rulings were overbroad and inconsistent. A simple law stating that M rated games, games that are labelled voluntarily by the industry of being "not appropriate for minors" would be acceptable.
    How do I come to this conclusion? Some states have laws banning the sale of R rated movies to minors that have held up under scrutiny.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    dan, 19 Dec 2005 @ 6:29am

    Re: Facts straight

    Yeah, while IANAL and IANASCJ (supreme court justice), I would have to agree that I don't see the un-constitutionality of this. Alcohol and cigarettes are restricted from minors, and for a better analogy, pornography is restricted to adults. There are many laws (maybe they aren't laws, regulations instead?) that control what can be distributed to minors.

    I was actually under the impression that regulations already existed in the game industry. I assumed that M rated games could not be sold to children.

    Not that I am for this kind of thing. Not having kids, I am not really sure where I stand. I think that if I felt they were mature enough to handle the content, I would buy it for them, and if they weren't mature enough, and bought it themselves I would take it from them. Parents can do stuff like that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    sharp, 19 Dec 2005 @ 6:41am

    mature pfft

    OMG look what that halo fanboy is doing to that alien BAN THAT GAME. over friggin hype is all, dont ban kids from getting games, i would just have my mom buy it while im about 5 feet over there ;) im 15 so im not really a kid.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    lanval, 19 Dec 2005 @ 10:34am

    Re: mature pfft

    Sorry, at 15, you're a kid. Deal.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    crystalattice (profile), 19 Dec 2005 @ 1:46pm

    It won't work.

    These laws will never stop stupid parents from buying whatever games their little brat kids want. Just look at that case a few months back when the lady bought her grandson GTA:SA. The kid may not have been able to buy the game but all he had to do was ask for it.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.