Broadband Over Power Lines -- This Time, They Mean It

from the shocking dept

One of the longest-running objects of unfulfilled hype is broadband over power lines. Back in 1999, some company was almost ready to deliver exabit speeds (apparently that's a 1 with 18 zeros after it bits per second). We're still waiting on that, but every couple years, another story that BPL is almost ready pops up. There have been some small-scale commercial rollouts of the technology, but nothing that comes even close to fulfilling the hype built up around the technology. But power company TXU said today it would roll out BPL across 70 percent of its grid, potentially reaching a couple million people. What's curious about the announcement, though, is that it's less focused on selling broadband to customers through their power outlets, but more about how TXU will use the broadband capability to monitor and maintain its network and do automatic meter reading and things of that nature. It's a much less sexy application, but perhaps where BPL actually has some value -- at least killing the time while we're waiting for the power to send terabytes of data to our lamps and washing machines.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    OK, 19 Dec 2005 @ 10:43am

    TXU?

    Ahhh, now I understand it. TXU is joint venture with CapGemini.

    Now I know its all hype.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    don pablo, 19 Dec 2005 @ 11:36am

    IPv6 here we come

    Now that we have network connection at every power outlets, we have a use for IP adderesses for everything we plug in. No longer is it science fiction that our toaster, refrigerator, and television can exchange information and be available for hacking. Alright!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 19 Dec 2005 @ 12:57pm

    No Subject Given

    Power companies already send data over power lines. Power Line Carrier (PLC) is used for command and control but it is narrow-band low frequency (100 to 180 kHz) and low speed.

    Current BPL is wide-band and uses 2.46 to 38 MHz. It offers 1-3 mBits/sec to the end point.

    Power lines carrying a signal will just be a huge antenna creating noise in the 2.46 to 38MHz range.

    Polluting:
    HF/VHF Users
    HF Users
    Broadcast
    Aviation
    Amateur Radio Service
    Marine and Land Mobile


    Which is why the FCC will never allow it to pass on those frequencies.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    anonymous coward, 19 Dec 2005 @ 1:31pm

    The real reason

    It was explained to me by an industry insider that the real reason power companies are drooling over BoPL is so that they can change your meter to a device they can read over their net link, and fire all the meter readers out there, thus saving themselves a lot of money.

    The insult comes in that the only reason they even talk of extending the service to the "public" is so that "we" can pay for the system, so they don't have to. (those of us who remember the diablo canyon nuclear power plant in California understand what a burden these projects can be to the public)

    The other serious issue is the interference these systems cause to ham radio frequencies and other public frequecy spaces.

    BPL it's not just another bad idea, it's... no, it's just a bad idea.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    googly_eyes, 19 Dec 2005 @ 2:02pm

    FCC approval

    As I understand it, from a presentation to our HAM radio group, they have approved it - at least preliminarily, that or they are very close to it.

    According to the draft of the proposal, the only certification that is required is done by the manufacturer of the equipment, not the finished installation. So if the install isn't to spec, it requires a pain in the tail survey by the complainant (whomever is getting interference), and something on the order of a 6+ month wait.

    The ARRL ( http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/ ) is fighting them tooth and nail on this.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    BJC (profile), 19 Dec 2005 @ 2:42pm

    No Subject Given

    When power co's can read your meter in real time, they can manage demand much more effectively, thus reducing the number of polluting generation plants they need to build to satisfy peak demand.

    With the ability to meter in real time they can, for example, offer people discounts for consuming their electricity at off-peak times. You could save money by running your clothes dryer after 11pm when demand is lower, or making sure your electric furnace / air conditioner is off when usage peaks between 4 and 6 pm weekdays.

    One study I read says power co's could save enough money simply by being able to gauge and manage this peak demand to fund the BoPL system in its entirety.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    mr. synical, 19 Dec 2005 @ 5:10pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    And I have some prime Florida land I'd like to sell to you (it even has a bridge on it).

    Since when has the energy industry EVER passed savings on to their customers? Stockholders, maybe, but customers? Don't hold your breath.

    No, I believe they will try and stick the cost to the customers, as usual, crying that they can't afford to fund something intended to "serve the public" and waltz away to the bank with the savings they make. (and to be REALLY synical, I'm guessing they will even ask the Government to help subsidize the whole thing too, thus whacking us twice).

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Ivan Sick, 19 Dec 2005 @ 5:27pm

    Re: IPv6 here we come

    I hope you are joking. Just because we can do something doesn't mean it "has a use."

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.