Must... Have... More... Bandwidth
from the more-more-more dept
US broadband providers are in the midst of a speed boost, offering new, higher tiers of speeds -- even as high as 50 Mbps -- and demanding higher prices. As Om Malik points out, it's all about the money: increasing the bandwidth to customers doesn't cost these companies all that much, but it's something for which they can charge a lot more. The rub, though, is that people with these faster connections don't necessarily use the net more -- an experience confirmed by high-speed networks in Japan that have seen only a modest increase in overall traffic following speed raises. Why? For one thing, people are settling down in how they use the internet, gravitating towards some key activities for which having a faster line doesn't necessarily dictate increased usage -- like IM and email. Also, regardless of how much time it takes to download something like a movie or song, it takes the same amount of time to play it back. So because you can download a movie in about 10 minutes on a 30-megabit line, it still takes 2 hours to watch -- so users' appetite for media consumption may not scale with the speed of their connection. The other side of the bandwidth boost wonders just how much people really notice these higher speeds, particularly in normal Web surfing. Probably not much, really, once they get past a certain point. But, as Om again notes, people perceive that they're getting faster speeds and a better experience, and they'll pay for it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
50mbps
If they gave us 50mbps upload, you'd see a very large change in how people use internet, since you'd be able to successfully share things with your friends without it taking forever at your 40kbps upload speed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 50mbps
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
You got it partially right. If the ISP found out about you running a web server they would probably cut off your connection. For most, like myself, it doesnt matter. I run a developement server at home that is not used much except for tests.
They close port 25 due to the fact that many people can easily spam and use up a lot of bandwidth this way.
They are not closing it down to prevent a game server from running. Most cant spam through a game server. Note I said MOST.
As stated before, they make more money by having you pay more for hosting things through them or a 3rd party host (supposing they get bandwidth though AT&Ts network). As long as the greed outweights the desire to get internet to the masses (or the gov steps in), it will always be like this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
A friend which uses the service regularly clocks 8Mbps down and 8Mbps up.
Kicks the trash out of my Comcast connection.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not a matter of using it!
I want really a broad broadband. Call it a hugeband. Not because I need it, but just because if I need it I want it. I don't usually download whole movies, but in 15 minutes a wonderful lady wil come to my house and ask to watch, I don't know, Breakfast at Tiffany, which I don't have and BlokcBuster, of course, hasn't either. Just the risk of running nto such a situation might make me want hugeband connections.
It's like buying a Ferrari (assuming that I could afford a Ferrari): I would buy it not because I want to drive fast all the time or to drive fast at all: just the coolness factor, the awareness that in emergencies I COULD drive very fast, or that I could overtake that truck in less time than my Honda Civic, or that I like the feeling of just caressing the huge raw power of that engine, even if I will never need it. That's just enough for most Ferraris' drivers, and would just be enough for me. And for having hugeband, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
From an ISP standpoint
You also have to take into account that the smaller ISPs and most of the telecom world still have to pay about $800 for 1.5mbps pipes. If they let uploads just run rampant, they would have to spend a fortune on more t-1's and thus charge more for the service. I think ISP's are doing fine considering the government constrants and the competing with unregulated services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why do they always interpret results wrong
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But it's not everywhere
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bandwidth
Is it worth the extra money? Probably not on the downstream side, but on the upstream, definitely yes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sometimes it's a web server issue
Using the Ferrari example above, all that power and a desire to go fast is useless if the highway is jammed up with idiots going at half (or say a tenth) the speed limit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]