Wonder Why The Wireless Industry Fails To Live Up To Expectations?
from the trade-press? dept
We've already talked about problems with reporters completely buying into misleading statements from companies in the wireless industry -- from those who claim that WiMax exists and is deployed (when it doesn't, and it isn't) to those who report the "up to" speeds as if they're the average speeds. In many cases, it happens because reporters simply take a press release, re-arrange the words a bit and suddenly have an article. We understand that reporters can get lazy, and that some can make mistakes (hey, we do it too), but sometimes you have to wonder if reporters (or their editors) even bother to read what they write at all. We already know that fact checkers are a thing of the past, but you'd still expect reporters to at least try to get the story straight -- especially in specialist trade publications where people are looking on them to be experts.That's why it's disappointing to read an article in "Wi-FiPlanet" about Lenovo's new deal to put HSDPA in its laptops -- where the story gets so many things wrong. It starts right at the top with the title: "New ThinkPads Extend Wi-Fi." The HSDPA network has nothing to do with Wi-Fi. It's a totally separate network. Next, the article claims that Cingular's HSDPA "BroadBandConnect represents a huge increase over Wi-Fi connection speeds." It certainly represents a huge increase over Cingular's GPRS and EDGE speeds, but not Wi-Fi speeds. Then comes the spin from Lenovo: "We'll be the only ones out there with integrated wireless WAN." It's an interesting quote, but it's mostly wrong -- and a reporter for a wireless trade publication should recognize that. Over the past half a year, we've had stories about Dell, HP and Sony all planning similar laptops with embedded 3G wireless -- meaning that it's not a differentiator for Lenovo at all. It would seem like this is the type of thing that a reporter should at least ask about, rather than simply printing it as fact. Lenovo could respond that they got their laptops out first (by a small margin), but that's not what the story implies. All in all, this is quite disappointing -- because one of the biggest problems facing the wireless industry today is all of the overhype that comes with each story -- and much of that comes from reporters who simply parrot the misleading statements from companies. If we actually had reporters who looked critically at what was being fed to them, maybe everyone's expectations wouldn't keep getting set at impossible levels.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
wireless expectations
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Agreed
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Advertising does cost dollars usually...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
What concerns me more about wireless isn't hype. It's how its popularity outpaces its security concerns. TKIP has been standardized for over a year and a half and even the most experienced IT personnel I come across haven't heard of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Agreed
[ link to this | view in thread ]