FTC Recognizes Netflix Settlement Is Really Just A Promotional Gimmick

from the do-they-read-Techdirt? dept

Back in November, we mocked the "settlement" that Netflix had agreed to in a class action suit concerning misleading advertising (though we also questioned just how "injured" anyone was by Netflix's original actions). The problem with the settlement went beyond the fact that the lawyers basically racked up most of the cash that Netflix paid out -- we've pretty much come to expect that. The real problem was that the settlement for customers was basically a marketing promotion, rather than any punishment, and was likely to pay off for Netflix rather handsomely in the long run. That's because the settlement meant Netflix customers would receive a "free" one month upgrade (or reinstated account if they had left), but at the end of the month, if they didn't proactively decline to keep the upgrade they would automatically be kept at that level and have to pay the higher fee. It would appear that the folks at the FTC aren't just going around and rubber stamping these deals as they saw the same thing we did (as did a number of others who set up websites to complain). The FTC has now asked the judge to reject the settlement, which they say: "appears dangerously close to being a promotional gimmick." As we said in the original post, if this settlement is allowed to stand, it opens up a great new line of business for some lawyers. Set up random class action lawsuits for some wrong that may have been done by customers and then quickly "settle" it for a few million (seen as an advertising cost by the "guilty" company) and force all their users into unexpected upgrades that many will fail to manually downgrade. It's the sort of thing that would pay for itself almost instantly.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Brad Leonard, 11 Jan 2006 @ 6:36am

    Good for goose, good for landshark

    I'd like to see a judge switch the "damages" and compensation on one of these cases.
    "Counsel, you and your firms all have free upgrades for a month. Members of the Class, you will split $15 Million". If they attorneys are truly acting in the best interest of their clients, this wouldn't be much of an issue.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    hautedawg, 11 Jan 2006 @ 7:21am

    We don't learn

    This happens day in and day out in America. We see advdrtisements in the media, we get mailings, hell, I even get phone calls about CAL. The ONLY winner in these things are the leeches that we call attorneys. I have nothing against (most) attorneys, but this is ridiculous. NetFlix has found a wonderful way to increase it's revenue and actually profit from the CAL. How ridiculous is that? Law suits are meant to punish and make the plaintif whole, not to contribute to the bottom line of the corporate scum. NetFlix didn't do anything wrong in my opinion, just someone wanting something for nothing, but that doesn't mean that should increase revenues through the suit. And we wonder why no one trusts the legal system. Hrrmph

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    JFarley, 11 Jan 2006 @ 9:24am

    TimeWarner

    TimeWarner recently did the same thing. If you responded to become part of the class action, you got either 1 month of any service you currently did not have for free and you had to then call to discontinue the service or continue to be billed for it. You did also have the choice of 2 VOD movies as well as an alternate choice - but a $40 value say for trying their broadband service vs $8 of movies is a tempting incentive for some people. In the end, the consumer loses and corporate America pulls the wool over their eyes.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    haggie, 11 Jan 2006 @ 9:46am

    No Subject Given

    I'm simply disgusted. Judges that sign-off on these types of settlements need to be identified and removed from the bench. It is unconscienable.

    I would expect it from politicians, but from judges? How much more corrupt, lackadaisical, and self-serving can our society become?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ryan, 11 Jan 2006 @ 11:20am

      Re: No Subject Given

      IMO, these days judges are treated like politicians. Too many issues track through the courts rather than going through a Constitutional amendment procedure.
      I'm tired of a few judges deciding what's right or wrong. I'd much rather have the majority decide.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous, 11 Jan 2006 @ 9:57am

    Sanction 'em! Big bucks, no wammy, STOP

    The real question here is: Why aren't the plantiff and defense attorneys being sanctioned for this? How about the judge?

    So long as the penalties for CRIME are not enforced for these people, they will continue to game the system.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.