Fryer Art Threatens Apple Patent Application

from the oh-the-puns dept

One slightly cool little feature of Apple's new Intel-based laptop is the connector for its power cord. Instead of being a plug that fits into a socket, the connector -- called MagSafe -- is held in by a magnet, so if it's yanked on or tripped over, it comes out without breaking anything. Steve Jobs was quite proud of the new connector, noting that it was "patent pending", but similar connectors have been used on deep fryers and other kitchen appliances for some time now. The idea is that should a child reach up and grab the cord, it will just detach, instead of showering the kid with hot oil. While the consequences of yanking a MacBook Pro cord probably aren't so dire, Steve's hopes for a patent aren't looking too likely.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    DV Henkel-Wallace, 12 Jan 2006 @ 4:48pm

    Probably a design patent

    You can also get design patents (e.g. size, shape, etc). So they wouldn't have control over the idea of a magnetic latch, but only the shape. This is why you can't make a player that looks too much like an iPod for example.

    What you are thinking of is a utility patent. And I am sure Jobs doesn't mind if you make that mistake.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Mr. Chapman, 12 Jan 2006 @ 4:57pm

    It's About Time

    I have destroyed not only my own but also a customers laptop because somone tripped on the cord, so i dont care as long as i get to use it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Aaron Friel, 12 Jan 2006 @ 5:41pm

    No Subject Given

    Very similar non-magnetic devices have been in use for an even longer time.

    Innovative? Not really.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    crystalattice (profile), 12 Jan 2006 @ 5:49pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    On the contrary, this is really innovative for computers, specifically laptops. How many people have broken a computer, crashed a HD, or otherwise damaged a laptop due to an accidentally pulled power cord?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    nao, 12 Jan 2006 @ 5:52pm

    No Subject Given

    its not so much that the power cord itself is innovative, its the way its being used thats innovative. the wheel sure was cool when it was first made, slap it on something that has an engine and seats and thats genius

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    mark, 12 Jan 2006 @ 7:05pm

    prior art

    Interesting development.
    1). This is the Steve Jobs "reality distortion field" on the high setting. Take an idea from a kitchen appliance, call it new and then walk across the stage as if across water.
    2). Call something new, even if it's been done many times before, and since it's now been done by Apple, it's the best new idea of the century.
    I hope the original inventor gets a nice royalty for his idea.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Sage Osterfeld, 12 Jan 2006 @ 7:12pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    ...its not so much that the power cord itself is innovative, its the way its being used thats innovative.
    Baloney. The magnetic power cord is being used to protect something valuable from potentially being damaged. My Euro-fry, which I've had for years, (it's the way Europeans fry their food!) has a magnetic connector and it protect something valuable (namely my kids) from being potentially damaged.

    Steve was obviously frying up some chicken nuggets one night and thought "hey -- this is pretty cool!"

    Just because he's the first guy to take a deep fryer power cord and attach it to a laptop doesn't mean he should get a patent for it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Jan 2006 @ 9:21pm

    Re: prior art

    Yea I sure he will ust like Apple gets one for each windows version that is sold. Think of BASF "we don't make the product we make it better"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    mhh5, 12 Jan 2006 @ 10:22pm

    always read the patent first...

    Before we all start jumping to conclusions, we should probably read the actual patent (if we can find it) -- who knows, AAPL may have patented the optimum magnetic strength to attach a power cord while not affecting sensitive electronics inside a laptop. There may be a reason why no laptop maker has put this on a laptop before....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Scott, 13 Jan 2006 @ 5:32am

    Re: always read the patent first...

    hehehe...Most likely reason is cost, but since apple's already cost much more than IBM clones, but are now little more than IBM clones with OSX, they have to have a reason to charge those prices.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    AC, 13 Jan 2006 @ 6:29am

    Talk about an “Ancient Suggestion”

    Check out US patent Classification 439 ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS Subclass 38: WITH MAGNET: This subclass is indented under the class definition. Electrical connector combined with means to cause one portion of the device to be drawn toward a member of iron or ironlike composition by magnetic attraction. (1) Note. The "magnet" of this subclass may be either a permanent magnet or an electromagnet. Subclass 39: To urge mating connectors together: This subclass is indented under subclass 38. Electric connector wherein the means to cause magnetic attraction is intended to hold the connector in position with respect to a cooperating connector to transmit electricity thereto. (1) Note. The connector of this subclass is not necessarily a "coupling part". Subclass 40: To urge connector to supporting surface: This subclass is indented under subclass 38. Electrical connector wherein the means to cause magnetic attraction is intended to hold the connector to another member and hold the connector against the force of gravity. This is just some of the prior art on the subject: 2,234,982 April 7, 1939 3,363,214 Jan 9, 1968 4,211,456 July 8, 1980 6,250,931 June 26, 2001 6,267,602. July 31, 2001 6,478,614 Nov 12, 2002 6,527,570 Mar 4, 2003 6,976,882 Dec 20, 2005

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Anonymous of Course, 13 Jan 2006 @ 7:07am

    Re: always read the patent first...

    There is a reason... design engineers are
    under constant pressure to reduce cost.

    I've had executives of a large US corp
    shouting F*CK YOU! IF YOU CAN'T DO IT
    WE'LL GET SOMEONE THAT CAN! During a
    teleconference over a three cent reduction
    in a bill of materials.

    When you run the company you can say, "hey,
    this is cool, lets add this" and no one has
    a seizure over the cost. For a deep fryer
    the cost is outweighed by the potential for
    injury and being sued (in Europe at least
    in the US they just put really short cords
    on the appliance.)

    So anyway... Jobs adds a feature that keeps
    dopes from busting their laptops and wows
    the crowd. Whoopie.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 14 Jan 2006 @ 3:50pm

    Re: It's About Time

    And what did you do after you destroyed them (the laptops)? Buy new ones? If so, then why the heck would the manufacturers want to change that? It's not like noone ever thought of this before, just noone making them wanted to do it.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.