Analyst Says Watch Out For Pre-N Gear
from the we-use-our-own-proprietary-standards dept
The 802.11n standard for next-generation WiFi was initially approved just last week, but chip companies say it won't be long before they'll have "pre-N" products ready. We've noted before how many companies don't wait for standards to be finalized or their products to be certified before they start pushing them to customers, potentially causing compatibility issues later on down the road with actual standardized equipment. Now, analyst firm Gartner is telling enterprise customers to stay away from the pseudo-802.11n equipment, because it expects the standard to be changed before it's finally ratified. They recommend waiting until 2007 to consider 802.11n gear, a timeframe the equipment makers' marketing people probably won't like.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Remember X2 vs K-Flex
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You could have solved that other ways
I'm running a three wifi router clound and serving neighbors across the street and next door to the side with IP quite reliably. For reference, I'm in a 3000 square foot 2 story house on a half acre plot.
more info here:
http://www.thenorth.com/APBLOG4.nsf/0/668D65A56B02BB4B852570A400535F16
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Remember X2 vs K-Flex
I bought in hundreds of pre-ratification modems at the time for point to point links: they didn't need to inter-operate with a different make and benefited my customers.
This will always happen while ratification is even slightly slow.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You could have solved that other ways
This allowed me to change the Xmit power on the box from 28mw 251mw with no ill result! I could imagine two or three of these cheaper routers outranging a single Pre-N setup for the same price, while keeping it standard...
And anyway, who needs all that bandwidth? Really? Nobody moves large files between wireless clients. B or G is going to be faster than your actual internet connection, so no difference there. Anybody who's doing, say, DV editing and wants to shuffle video around should get off their butts and just install Gigabit Ethernet.
I might move over to N eventually. When my laptop has it built in and if it does offer better range. But right now I don't see any benefit that justifies an awkward PCMCIA adapter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You could have solved that other ways
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You could have solved that other ways
Better coverage then ANY 802.11a/g could do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You could have solved that other ways
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I thought modifying antennas was illegal?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: You could have solved that other ways
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pre N
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MIMO Rocks!!
MIMO Rocks!! I used the SRX400 AP and the WPC54GX4 cardbus card. This is Airgo Chipsets and I am very very happy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]