Why Are Copy Protection Firms So Insecure?
from the just-wondering dept
It's amazing how insecure most copy protection firms seem to be. And, by insecure, I'm not talking about how they open up security holes, but how they react to criticism. Remember SunnComm, makers of the MediaMax copy protection scheme that began the process of suing Alex Halderman for pointing out that its copy protection could be defeated by pressing the shift key as you loaded the disc? Well, now we can add StarForce to the list. We first wrote about problems with their copy protection a few years ago, noting reports that it "installs itself without letting you know (not even in the EULA), hides itself on your PC, slows down the PC, causes all sorts of other problems and errors, and is nearly impossible to remove -- even after the protected application has been removed." Basically, it's no different than malware. Yesterday BoingBoing posted a similar story spurred on by a plan to boycott StarForce-enabled games... and the company responded by telling Cory Doctorow they were suing him (not clear for what), while also reporting him to the FBI for violating "approximately 11 international laws." It's unlikely (a) that they're really doing anything or (b) that, even if they did, any lawsuit or FBI interest would get anywhere. However, it does say something about these firms and their inability to take even the slightest criticism. Why not actually respond to the critics instead of trying to threaten them into submission? The threatening, of course, tends to backfire as the Streisand Effect kicks in and more people learn about the problems the company faces (and its inability to deal with them constructively). And, by constructively, we don't mean silly contests with conditions that are almost impossible to meet -- which is exactly what StarForce has done.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Copy Protection is Impossible
Everyone should read Cory's own Microsoft Research talk: "DRM systems are usually broken in minutes, sometimes days. Rarely, months. It's not because the people who think them up are stupid. It's not because the people who break them are smart. It's not because there's a flaw in the algorithms. At the end of the day, all DRM systems share a common vulnerability: they provide their attackers with ciphertext, the cipher and the key. At this point, the secret isn't a secret anymore."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Copy Protection is Impossible
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not DRM
They're quietly going to make content owners very happy and would be pirates very sad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not DRM
[ link to this | view in thread ]
too true
As for the DRM thing, it seems to me that licensing might be the way to go. If I buy a song, a game, or a movie, it might be nice if the right to use that product were somehow tied to my identity, rather than to a specific device or software. I think if people were then allowed to use that product how they wanted (guaranteed), on any device they wanted (perhaps in the future, connectivity will be so prevalent that everything can be streamed anywhere), they may be okay with not physically owning anything. This might ultimately be defeated as well (e.g. if the stream could be saved), but would no longer be interactive and have a diminished value. This requires further debate and some trials.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not DRM
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not DRM
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: too true
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
A few weeks ago my cd-rom stopped burning, for no apparent reason. Haven't played with it much, because I haven't really needed it. But reading up on this story, following links, led me to a list of games that have this copy protection on it... and lo and behold, I had just installed one (legitimately store-bought). In this case, Heroes of Might and Magic V. Good game, actually. Apparently, I need to figure out how to cleanse my system of this filth. But at least now, I have a clue.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
OTOH, if you meant Heroes IV . . . IIRC, the basic game used a different copy prevention mechanism, but the expansion packs used StarForce. If you've just bought an "all-in-one" edition it would come from that.
You can get a StarForce removal tool from the "Boycott StarForce" website:
http://www.glop.org/starforce/#remove
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
My suggestion to the guy who has had is computer hacked would be to read the packaging of the software and if it does not mention installing the copy protection anywhere in the fine print,
1 I would call the FBI and report a sucessful hack attack on my computer..... and goddamn the fucker that foced me to deal with Da Man,
2 I'd get me a good lawyer and sue the hell out of that company. You will definatly need a laywer that is not afraid to tell the other guy's laywer to shut the fuck up and get to the point of explaining exactly why his defendant illegally intalled malware on a computer without the owners permission.
And no, simply buying a peice of software does not give a company impliciant permission to install a bunch of extra crap on your computer without your permission.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
SEE PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT COMPANIES OUTSOURCING ON THIS SITE!!!!!
I found it on my PC promptly removed the MALWARE. To hell with the game it came on which is listed on glop dot org /starforce. I will be sending them a nasta gram shortly also asking them to stop dealing with outsourced companies in China and Russia and allowing them to install crap on peoples PCs without their knowledge. What else is this program doing and is it talking back to Mother Russia and Communist China?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
http://www.similarities.org/starforce.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]