Microsoft Clarifies: Amateurs And Hobbyists Not Wanted
from the no-room-for-you-around-here dept
A few weeks ago, we noted that the details of the proposed "analog hole" legislation made it clear that the bill was less about "protecting" content from being copied, and all about killing off amateur content production. It was so focused on setting up a different set of rules for "professionals" and "amateurs" that it was really just about trying to handicap the disruption that amateur content represented. Now, it appears that Microsoft has bought into that same vision. Two separate stories point to two separate quotes from Microsoft execs that both make this abundantly clear (they're not even tap dancing around the issue, like you'd expect). The first comes from Tim Lee, who points to a Jim Allchin interview where he was quoted as saying that the only way anyone will be able to watch digital TV is if it's been certified by CableLabs -- meaning that hobbyists and tinkerers are out. Meanwhile, someone in the comments to that article point to a talk by another Microsoft exec, talking about how the company views copy protection as only being for professionals: "We don't want this technology to be available to every hobbyist. We need to keep the number of licensees down to a manageable number. We charge a license fee to keep the number of people we have to deal with down to a level we can handle." They may want to do that to keep it "manageable," but it has the side effect again of trying to block out hobbyists -- who are doing some of the most innovative work right now. Of course, while some people are pointing out the anti-competitive nature of these statements, the truth is that the only ones it's really damaging for are for Microsoft and for the professional content producers. They're pretty much guaranteeing that everyone else will look elsewhere to work with technology that isn't trying to hold them back.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Me, cynical?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fortunately
It is out there now, and will always be out there. Just because people can't use M$ Media Player, doesn't mean that they can't install some other kind of video player. Amature content has always been under attack by the institutions (govts and corporations alike). Yet, amature content has always and will forever exist.
The only way these institutions can win their fight is to destroy the creative spirit of man (THX 1138).
Good luck to them on that front.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does it really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Imagine...
The big business players (MS, studios etc) will have their DRM'd, copy-protected, practically-unplayable-because-of-locked-content (ad's you can't skip) etc format that will limit itself to certified, genuine and probably over-expensive content.
And there will be another format that will allow the user to (partially) playback, copy and maybe even paste the content. Call it a free (in the sense of what you can do with the content, not the fact that content doesn't cost anything).
And now for the real funny part: because the locked, unpopular system is so user-unfriendly, the 'all the rest' system will become the system of choice for the creative and innovative: artists will release directly under the 'free' system, shortcircuiting the entire 'industry'.
Or rather... the industry shortcircuiting itself because they made themselves incompatible.
By the way, I suppose that pretty soon there will be ripped, converted, de-DRM'd copies of the locked content available in the free format. On the other hand, I don't quite see the reverse ever happening...
You may guess once which system will prevail...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Imagine...
Draconian "anti-hacking" and "intellectual property protection" laws will make it a FELONY to use or manufacture a non-approved player.
Will hacked versions be available? Sure, but the vast bulk of the population won't be able to get one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look at the bright side..
If software companies and content providers lock down all forms of media and make them prohibitively expensive maybe it will force a few folks to turn off their TVs/computers, step outside, and get a little exercise.
I for one think that's something we all could use.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Water flows down the path of least resistance...
If the only thing that "amaetur" artists can do is eek out a "living" (say, $40,000/yr) by doing local gigs (local concerts/local screenings)buying time on local Lease Access ($300/hr here at San Antonio, TX)and selling their CDs iPod/PSP friendly videos and DVDs locally or on the internet(don't know why we would have to throw out a perfectly good video media because someone is telling us its not good enough),then so be it.
Now if content creators (a.k.a "creative folk") want to get greedy and make more money, then there are two choices;
do a Buckethead, and release 13 CDs (or movies) a year.
"Sell out" and sign on with a record label/production company and be a tool.
whatever you can live with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The future of kids
Will they even know what "free" is?
Or will there be a "free" only different?
Anti Competitive behaviour is illegal in most countries isn't it?
MP3 is just the new Audio Tape, just like AVI is the new VHS tape.
AVI is like TV, FREE
MP3 is like radio, FREE
*** will be just like DRM only FREE
[ link to this | view in chronology ]