If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Hertz Ordered To Tell Court How Many Thousands Of Renters It Falsely Accuses Of Theft Every Year
- Even As Trump Relies On Section 230 For Truth Social, He's Claiming In Lawsuits That It's Unconstitutional
- Letter From High-Ranking FBI Lawyer Tells Prosecutors How To Avoid Court Scrutiny Of Firearms Analysis Junk Science
- FTC Promises To Play Hardball With Robocall-Enabling VOIP Providers
- FOIA Lawsuit Featuring A DC Police Whistleblower Says PD Conspired To Screw Requesters It Didn't Like
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
loophole?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: loophole?
Hah.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not about inappropriate websites...
Giving the police the power to take down "inappropriate" sites leads to an arbitrary decision as to what is considered "inappropriate".
This ruling simply means that the final decision has to go through the courts... which I consider a reasonable and necessary check on police power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]