If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Phoenix City Council Says PD Can Have Surveillance Drones Without Any Policy In Place Because Some Officers Recently Got Shot
- New Right To Repair Bill Targets Obnoxious Auto Industry Behavior
- Former Employees Say Mossad Members Dropped By NSO Officers To Run Off-The-Books Phone Hacks
- San Francisco Cops Are Running Rape Victims' DNA Through Criminal Databases Because What Even The Fuck
- Clearview Pitch Deck Says It's Aiming For A 100 Billion Image Database, Restarting Sales To The Private Sector
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Me, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Me, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Me, too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They need to make a couple of calls
Take a couple of the faxes and call the people whose information they have received.
Explain to them that they really didn't want to receive their private health information and that in fact them receiving the information was a violation of the HIPAA.
Tell them that the insurance company has chosen not to prevent the situation, event though they could. And that their doctor doesn't pay enough attention to detail to dial the right fax number.
Explain to them that if they care about their privacy they should contact the Chief Privacy Officer of the insurance company, as well as the doctor's office / hospital and discuss it with them.
I'm sure the faxes would quickly stop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They need to make a couple of calls
Of course I'd have the person, whose information was so haphazardly thrown around, take this info to an attorney and place a lawsuit accordingly for HIPAA violations.
We've already seen a medical billing company take a "network administrator"(I personally think the idiot rode the short bus to school) to court over directly connecting the company's machines to the internet without any firewall or security checks beyond a Belkin(tm) router. I'm guessing you know how this turned out...25,000 people's info was suddenly not-so-private.
And to think that some of my friends say I'm too paranoid.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They need to make a couple of calls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Finally I started writing comments on the form like "i'm only a software engineer but it doesn't look good for fluffy. I think we will have to put him down." and fax it to both parties.
Eventually it did stop - not because they fixed the problem, but because I switched to Vonage and had to change my fax number.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm... Local news...
Not gonna happen, I would honestly just start writing the insurance company and prodding them into getting their act together.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MMM... the future
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
it isn't uncommon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HIPAA Penalty
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HIPAA and fax control
I'm with a company which supplies fax servers to a number of hospitals, mostly in North America, and we have done so for many years.
HIPAA has no _clear_ statement on faxing, due to it not being a clear electronic-to-electronic format by its definitions. What's used in its place is the recomendation of HIMSS for handling faxes, which amounts to the "don't read if it's not you" statement, along with additional info (hosptial name, sending agent, etc). And realize that even if HIPAA did have a clear standard, the requirements are such that all one has to show is that (a) rules are in place at the facility and (b) controls are in place to make sure the rules are followed. The point being the HIPAA compliance is more up to the hospital than the legislation. (I could go on but don't want to drag this out.)
If the doc's office is sending from a fax machine I'm not sure what you can do other than hand slapping. Otherwise speed dial is an option, as is controls on the PBX side, although you'll probably find that just whining them into compliance might be for the best. If, however, they're sending the job from the HIS through a fax or message server, then various controls are available, including using fixed phone book entries, dialing codes or even CSID checking.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would send the fax back 10 x or 100 x
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I would send the fax back 10 x or 100 x
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
information
Have a question. I sent important info. to a wrong fax number how can i get my fax back? Please, help me its very important.
thank you for your time and understanding in this email.
sincerely,
mcr
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wrong fax number
Thank you topjob
[ link to this | view in chronology ]