Anonymous Emailer Annoyed By Anti-Annoy Law
from the start-the-lawsuits dept
While there's still some level of disagreement over what an updated law really says concerning the legality of anonymous annoying communications, the operator of an anonymous emailing service is concerned enough that it's decided to sue for an injunction against enforcing the law. The government's defense may simply be that lots of people are misreading the law -- but, perhaps that's a good reason that the language ought to be clarified.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
That's the problem with the majority of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That's the problem with the majority of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That's the problem with the majority of
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not so unclear really...
also/or
and/or
Not altogether unclear... it is only criminal if the intent is to annoy (abuse threaten or harass)...
The part that amuses me with getting up at arms is that it ALREADY included text messaging, paging, email, newsgroups... etc...
Doing any of the above (and MORE) over a "telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device" is a violation.
I would have considered an internet connected PC to be a "telecommunications device" all along... and so would you...
This law was ALREADY there, they just clarified it...
Spammers are just about the only people SAFE from this, because their intent is (cough) pure... They ONLY want to advertise, possibly cheat you, possibly offer you fake rolex's... They are never actively trying to annoy you... the rest of us... eh... we tend to have other things in mind.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Crying Wolf, again
For the debunking, read: http://volokh .com/posts/1136873535.shtml
[Orin Kerr, January 10, 2006 at 1:12am]
A Skeptical Look at "Create an E-annoyance, Go to Jail":
Declan McCullagh has penned a column that is custom-designed to race around the blogosphere. It begins:
"Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime. It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity. ... [ed: snip]"
This is just the perfect blogosphere story, isn't it? It combines threats to bloggers with government incompetence and Big Brother, all wrapped up and tied togther with a little bow. Unsurprisingly, a lot of bloggers are taking the bait.
Skeptical readers will be shocked, shocked to know that the truth is quite different. ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i need mailer
[ link to this | view in thread ]