Kleiner Perkins Sees Profits In Pandemics?

from the cheerful-subject dept

While highly targeted venture capital funds don't always do well, top VC firm Kleiner Perkins doesn't seem to mind them. It apparently did quite well a decade ago with its "Java fund." The latest, which comes as a bit of a surprise, is apparently a $200 million "pandemic fund". It's obviously to fund ideas to prevent pandemics, rather than create them. That's certainly an excellent cause, but a very narrowly focused one -- and one that might raise a lot more questions about likelihood of profits than something that is more broadly applicable like a specific technology. That doesn't mean to imply that this is a bad thing. In fact, it's potentially wonderful and life-saving to invest in pandemic prevention. It'll just be interesting to watch how well the fund actually does from a business standpoint. It seems like their may be a lot of luck involved. If the fund hits a home run by investing in "the cure" for something big, then great. If not...
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    giafly, 16 Feb 2006 @ 6:55am

    Sounds like a bad bet

    • If there's no pandemic, the fund value falls and you lose money
    • If there is a pandemic, the economy collapses, or at least hits a major recession, and your money is worth less

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Michael, 16 Feb 2006 @ 8:43am

    Re: Sounds like a bad bet

    Your first bullet is a little off. There is a cost associated with preventing pandemics. As long as the fund invests in companies who are at the receiving end of that transfer of money, the fund will succeed. Of course, the preventors of a malady are usually the ones on the cost side... so who knows.

    But whether it makes a profit or not, it's still a) a great value to society and b) great PR for the firm, which may boost their other funds.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Feb 2006 @ 9:16am

    No Subject Given

    No Pandemic: You lose money

    Global Pandemic: You die a rich man.

    Sounds like a joy of a fund to invest in...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    dorpus, 16 Feb 2006 @ 9:17am

    What about slow pandemics?

    What if there are no dramatic Hollywood-style pandemics, but instead diabetes slowly consumes the majority of the world's population? Or aging causes a slow but drastic decline in world economic productivity?

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.