Judge Says The DOJ's BlackBerrys Will Get Cut Off Like Everybody Else's
from the no-preferential-treatement-here dept
The judge ruling on the RIM patent case has denied a bid by the Department of Justice to hold hearings on why government users' BlackBerry devices should be exempt from any potential shutdown of service, just two days before he hears arguments on whether to grant NTP's request for an injunction against RIM operating its service in the US. The move comes amid questions being raised over why the government should get special treatment, even though NTP has basically said RIM could go on serving the government. But if the patent can be ignored for the government's interest, why should it be enforced on everybody else?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Gov't BS
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Blackberry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Blackberry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Blackberry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Blackberry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Special treatment isn't atypical
- Selective enforcement does not invalidate a patent (unlike the case of trademark infringement) and in fact is common. Typically the richest is sued first and then possibly the smaller players are hoovered up, or alternatively a weaker user is sued first and then when they cave that is used as precedent.
- Usage by the US government is generally unlimited by patent and indeed such usage can be and is(!) delegated to third party suppliers (look at Crater v. Lucent for a high-profile example from just last year).
Personally I think it would be great if NTP got the blackberry network shut down -- good for folks like Palm (I'm not a shareholder, just someone who likes competition) and good for raising the issue of how messed up the software patent world is at the moment. Patent law actually seems to work outside the software domain (a few screw-ups not withstanding) so we need a good example to show the non software-aware how software differs.[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
Bha-ha-ha-ah-ah...........
A-ah-ah-ah-ah-ah-..............
Ok, I managed to recover now...
So, what those stupid bastards are saying is that US Government and national security critically depend on some crackberry e-mail service which is routed through some relay server in Canada in order (as originally and wrongly planned) to avoid some patents issued by the US Government.
If this is not outrageously stupid then what is ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just kill Crackberry already !
Yeah, I remember reading about Crater vs. Lucent case.
Lucent is just a bunch of dirtbags..
And some moron invoked government executive priviledge so that Lucent doesn't have to pay a dime to 3 Crater guys while making some undisclosed amount (likely in 100s of mils) on governmebt contract.
What a world we live in !
[ link to this | view in thread ]
National security
There are a number of ways the government can simply shutdown the case, no matter what the judge says. It's not always possible to for them to do this, but around patents in particular, there are ways to deal with this sort of situation. One way is to simply make this a national security patent ( see http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/invention/admin.html ) and make it classified. I don't think they've gone down this route yet as they are trying to work within the system, but if push came to shove...
Chris.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Special treatment isn't atypical
NTP's patents have all been rejected, and when it boils down to it, I believe they should be. I think if the network was shutdown, that would be a huge setback for any sort of real progress in software-patents (if we should even have them).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No Subject Given
It may not be an ideal way of working, but it's no different than the reliance on Blackberries of thousands of high level executives. Would a shutdown make it impossible for them to do their jobs, probably not, although it would make it a lot more difficult. It would cost a lot of time and money to implement a new solution, even if it is currently available.
BTW, you should be happy about this. 30 years ago, the government would have re-created the Blackberry system at great expense, now they just use off the shelf stuff where ever they can. They use the public internet for email (god forbid!), WiFi (for emergency communication even!) and technologies developed overseas like SAP and Linux (oh no!). All of which is good as they are the single largest consumer of technology and it would be a huge waste of money (and bad for the industry) if they tried to re-invent the wheel every time they needed to deploy a new functionality.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Special treatment isn't atypical
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh yeah, I am happy
So if some scumbag illegally implements my invention into his technology and gives it to US goventment for cheap (like those RIM scumbags did when they gace free Crackberries to Congress people), then I should be stripped of my patent, right ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Special treatment isn't atypical
[ link to this | view in thread ]