When Leaving Yahoo To Work For A Competitor, Don't Discuss Plans On Yahoo IM

from the just-a-suggestion dept

Yahoo has apparently sued mobile gaming company Mforma, claiming that a bunch of Yahoo employees left together to go to Mforma and took with them trade secrets. These sorts of disputes are fairly common, and usually end in some kind of settlement (in fact, Yahoo just settled a very similar lawsuit that was directed at them). However, what's interesting here is that the Yahoo employees apparently discussed their plans on company laptops using Yahoo's instant messaging program. It's not entirely clear what they discussed, and whether or not it really is directly relevant. However, it still seems like a good idea, that if you are thinking of ditching Yahoo to work somewhere else with a group of your co-workers, you probably shouldn't discuss those plans using Yahoo's own communications tools. Just a thought.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    gh, 27 Feb 2006 @ 9:35pm

    No Subject Given

    Does this mean that Yahoo! records your conversations so they can review them?

    How did they find this information out? Do they only go through all their own employees logs? Were the logs from their laptops, or from Yahoo's servers?

    Are the employees told their logs will be read in clear terms? Or is it really the that we should all expect someone is reviewing everything that we say?

    I know it feels that way, but if it truly is that way, its a big leap.

    I know about Echelon, but this is a private company, and not email which obviously does reside on their servers. IM is supposed to be person to person without intermediaries.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2006 @ 9:41pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    From the article -- "Drawing heavily from archived instant-messaging conversations ..."

    It doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling to know that Yahoo archives IM conversations. It would be a worthwhle research article for someone to review the privacy policies of each of the major IM services.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Feb 2006 @ 9:42pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Many companies keep records of all messages forever or close to it. I've seen many court cases where im's are retrieved 5 years after they were sent. Or in this case SMS.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    voice of warning, 27 Feb 2006 @ 9:51pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    I am amazed at how amny people still believe that anything they communicate on the internet, short of being uber encrypted, is private.

    email isn't private, IM isn't private, in each, since there is an itermediary, everyone should expect that anything they say can and will be read by someone other than they intended. Not only that, nothing prevents people from publishing those communications, including IM logs. (Not to mention the IM filter applications and boxes that log all IM activity on a corporate network)

    You have been warned, now carry on, I have some emails to read - Ted over in accounting is having a fight with his soon to be ex-girlfriend....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Kolya, 27 Feb 2006 @ 10:06pm

    There's a distinction to be made . .

    . . .between using IM at work on work provided machines and using IM "privately" meaning on your own time and on your own machine.
    Anyone working at any decent sized company should assume that all communications of any kind belong to that company and are subject to interception/retrieval. Those folks who were leaving were naive or dumb not to assume this.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    me, 27 Feb 2006 @ 10:08pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Yahoo IM has a built-in archive setting under the Messenger/preferences/Archive menu. When you turn this on, your messages are saved to disk by recipient.

    It's not surprising Yahoo would check this info if the laptops were company-pwned (whoops, little l33t h@x0R slipped in there). NEVER assume anything you do on a company laptop is private, esp. if you and a bunch of your friends are about to jump ship for the same company.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    TJ, 27 Feb 2006 @ 11:30pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    Companies like IM-Logic and others having IM Capture soft/hard-ware. In our company we know that all IM traffic is been captured (Y!,MSN,AOL, others) and archived for legal reasons. You should never assume that no one is listening into you conversation. Privacy is long gone.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Jerry F, 27 Feb 2006 @ 11:36pm

    No Subject Given

    I've always assumed that Yahoo IM is stored somewhere on a hard drive over at Yahoo.
    Something you might want to consider is an IM encryption program. I use SimpLite, http://www.secway.com.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Bigfatdummy, 28 Feb 2006 @ 2:48am

    No Subject Given

    Most company handbooks/policies now state that all communication is the property of the company and not the individual users. We (at my company) recently had to let an accountant go. The accountant emailed sensitive material (bank account information, tax id, etc) to his/her personal email account. Lucky for us our IT guy caught it and reported it to us. Logs can be a wonderful thing.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Nathan Mallamace, 28 Feb 2006 @ 3:23am

    Re: No Subject Given

    In regards to your statement "Privacy is long gone" you're wrong. It was never there to start. In fact if you're a company like Y!, MSN, AOL, you better CYA because there are a lot of fools out there that are willing to use your service for illegal reasons.

    Furthermore, who's going to watch out for the terrorists?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Feb 2006 @ 3:43am

    Re: No Subject Given

    Furthermore: who will watch the watchers?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    PaulM, 28 Feb 2006 @ 6:46am

    use OTR or similar

    There are SSL options for IM clients, but that only stops a network snooper from collecting your messages, it still means you have to trust the IM server.

    So, use "Off The Record" (OTR) - there's a plugin for gaim - which means that you don't have to trust the IM server.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Jeff, 28 Feb 2006 @ 12:18pm

    Re: No Subject Given

    It's possible that those "archives" were on their laptops. I keep copies of all of my IM conversations.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.