CD Player Dropped From Inflation Data, Phonograph Next?
from the neverending-treadmill dept
In the UK, the Office of National Statistics has decided to remove the personal CD player from the basket of goods which make up the RPI, the equivalent of our CPI, a measure of inflation. Nobody buys them anymore, the thinking goes, so the more popular and expensive mp3 player has replaced it. In the US, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, often make similar decisions. But does this make sense? Measures of inflation, when placed against wage measures, are supposed to indicate whether consumers are getting ahead. If prices go up, while wages stagnate, then that's a sign of trouble. Now, the reason that consumers buy mp3 players, and not CD players, is that they're better quality and a better deal. Or, put another way, consumers could still buy a high-quality CD player, and save a lot of cash for later. Either way they benefit. But, inflation data doesn't reflect this, it only notes that mp3 players are more expensive and thus the basket of consumer goods doesn't seem to go down in price. It seems that intellectual property isn't the only area in which the government has failed to adapt to new technology. Economic measurements need to show that consumers benefit from the rapid obsolescence and constant price deflation that marks the high-tech world.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The measure you are looking for is called purchasing or buying power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inflation data is a joke
So they moved the MP3 player in ... they probably moved something out of equal or close to equal value.
Don't know about the rest of you folks, but my cost of living is going up beyond the annual 3.6% rate of inflation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't get inflation period?
I mean, lets say we drop inflation, and everything is fixed in price as is today. Why should the fact that people get raises and pay increases cause the price of products to increase? Doesn't this mean that people will just buy more products thus making the companies selling these products richer?
Intead, it seems that everytime I get a wage increase, taxes go up, the cost of living goes up, the cost of homes and cars go up, I don't ever seem to get ahead, so the net effect is that I am making the same (if not less) net profit year after year.
Inflation also causes the poverty line to increase, as people who don't have a decent income or yearly wage hikes find it more and more impossible to make ends meet.
I think inflation just some artificial occurance that justifies economics as a valid thing, and not just a science of statistics for meaningless things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't get inflation period?
inflation is caused because the gov't can't keep their hands off the printing press. As this new money filters its way in to the economy, things become more expensive...really, each dollar is worth less.
Why would they do this? Simple. The earlier you get one of these new dollars, the more it is worth. Essentially, this is a form of taxation.
Check out the writings of Murray Rothbard et al. mises.org has a ton of stuff available for free online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't get inflation period?
It's not that simple...first, there's supply and demand. As we make more money, we are willing to spend more money. If a business sees that people are willing to pay more, why wouldn't they raise prices?
Businesses are just like people as well. If your business is spending more (ie pay raises), the business must be making more to compensate or the owner is losing money. Sometimes this means a price increase.
Think about it...if you make product z and then sell it to retailer for $5, who then sells to consumer for $10. If you give your employee a raise of $1 per z made, you have to raise your price to $6 or you make less money. The retailer then will raise their price as well, as long as the consumer's buying habits of product z stays the same at the higher price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I don't get inflation period?
Inflation happens because of the printing of money by the Federal Reserve with no backing whatsoever. Every dollar they print reduces the value of the dollar in your pocket. And they are printing billions of dollars, just out of thin air. Inflation is pretty much the thievery of the money we already have. People need to be more concerned about their purchasing power rather than the number of dollars in their bank account since the dollar can apparently be printed on the Federal Reserve's whim. Businesses raise prices because the dollar is worth less so in order to get the same value, they need more dollars. The more dollars that get pumped into the system will only lead to more inflated prices because companies will continue to raise their prices in order to get the same value.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mises.org
http://www.mises.org/studyguide.aspx?action=author&Id=299
And aside from Rothbard, there are hundreds of other brilliant works worth reading (or listening to) on that site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inflation data is a joke by RJD 3.6% rate of infla
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inflation
For instance, Scarcity is one. If a rancher has to destroy 50% of his cattle due to mad cow disease, then it probably won't effec tthe ecnomy too much... but if every rancher in the US has to destroy 50% of their cattle due to the disease, then a scarcity occurs. Supply and demnd... yada yada.
Another instance, Government fees and taxes. If the government raises or implements fees on all businesses of a certain type those businesses will have to charge more for their end product to make up the difference.
Still another, Regulations. If a series of companies is only allowed (by the govt) to harvest so many trees for instance, this creates a scarcity of goods. In order to pay for the cost of operating, those costs are passed on to the price of the end product. In this case it's likely the companies could produce more but they are not allowed to.
It's all pretty simple really. Any number of good articles can be found on the internet. Perhaps you should google something like "why does inflation happen?"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Inflation
Yes, those are types of inflation, but they are really just new equilibrium points reached due to changes in supply/demand. They are felt in the item in question.
Monetary inflation is pervasive throughout the entire economy. Even in those tech products, although their shifting supply/demand curves far outstrip this process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not all price changes are due to inflation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not all price changes are due to inflation
from the list of products and adding leading edge stuff,
the govenment takes advantage of the predictable price
drop and claims lower inflation.
This is why electronic devices, not housing and fuel
are good items for the list.
It's already been said, inflation due to printing money
is a form of taxation. They make the money you hold
worth less by printing more. Manipulation of the inflation
statistics is no surprise, is it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not all price changes are due to inflation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
modern Orwellian redefinition of "inflation"
The entire focus on the CPI is nothing more than a redefinition of the word "inflation" that severely confuses cause and effect, and leads to all kinds of idiotic nonsense, like some of the arguments that there can be price-inflation caused by non-monetary causes. It is true that prices can rise due to non-monetary causes -- however, this is always in response to some natural market phenomena (like a market price-response to natural disasters).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
CDs and Record Players
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
inflation is an increase in the amount of fiat mon
Sorry, but the classical and correct definition of the word inflation refers to expansionary monetary policies engaged in by States. You are confusing cause and effect.
The effect of inflation is that prices will be higher than they otherwise would be. This actual effect does not occur uniformly, but is rather non-uniform.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
energy/food are abstracted from core inflation bec
Go to: http://www.bls.gov. Select “Consumer Price Index�? under “Inflation and Consumer Spending.�? Under “Get Detailed CPI Statistics,�? select “Consumer Price Index-All Urban Consumers (Current Series)�? and select the following variables: the overall CPI, overall CPI less food/beverage, food/beverage, housing, medical care, education, entertainment, transportation. When the table populates, select ‘More Formatting Options’ at the top; here, keep the table format, deselect original data value, select 12 months percent change, enter the date range 1998 to 2005, select all time periods, and select include graphs.
A conclusion that can be drawn: energy and food are far more volatile than most other components of the CPI. Thus, when one speaks of 'core inflation,' they aren't discounting food/energy, they are simply defining what slice/dice they are looking at...the change in the full CPI basket, or the change in the more stable part of CPI (from which one can infer the current overall change in prices by adding the changes in food/energy) -- if one always spoke of the full measure, the documented swings would overstate the swings that we observe across the majority of the basket of goods -- in yet other words, only by looking at BOTH the full and the core series can one get a good idea of what's going on in the economy.
(BTW -- to really get interesting, we could now add the seasonality dimension to the above.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cost of living index
[ link to this | view in chronology ]