Once Again, Politicians Want Aussie ISPs To Block Porn
from the i'd-like-to-opt-in-to-the-porn,-please dept
An Australian political party has floated a proposal that would require ISPs to block R-rated content at their level, and prevent users from accessing it, unless they've decided to opt in to receive the full, big, bad internet. Sounds like a wonderful idea, apart from the ridiculousness of the task, as well as the misplacement of responsibility on ISPs to "protect" children. This sounds pretty similar to previous efforts in the country that assert the ISPs have a responsibility to censor the information their users request online. Filters have been historically shown to not be particularly accurate, and forcing their use on a network-wide basis (rather than allowing individual users to install them locally, should they desire) is a tremendous waste of resources. This and other attempts to legislate morality a pretty pointless exercises that cause more problems than they solve. Merging politics and technology often leads to trouble; adding morality to the mix makes it almost certain.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Don't have kids if you cannot afford their respons
If you have kids, you need to register them with your ISP and pay out the additional $$$ required for this new piece of hardware.
If the politicians want to play $$$-Hardball, the ISP should play right back - but charge the parents instead. Heck, being a parent isn't cheap... and this is just one more "cost" of being a parent. Why burden those people who decide to NOT have children, with your poor choices of having a kid that you cannot afford?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
politicians suck
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Don't have kids if you cannot afford their res
I agree - it should be the responiblity of the parents to "parent" their kids - that is their job. But, Anonymous Coward, lighten up - life is too short to be that angry.
Now, wipe the spittle off your monitor, take a deep breath, and relax before you have a heart attack.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Of course it is...
So to fix the root of the problem, there should be a law that makes it so you cant have kids till your not one anymore.
Raising kid's is and never has been easy, this is one more thing that the parents should take responsibility for. I have two kids myself, and while I just as much as the next person love to surf the web and look at porn and such I can guarendamntee that my kid's are not and have not had any access to any of that.
So Buck up parents and start being just that a Parent to your children.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Aussies/Anyone Legislating Morality
As to the point of having to register to see the big, bad, Internet: once you register, they know where to look when it comes time to crack down on some other issue.
The ISP's and the PEOPLE should push back and tell the government to mind the business for which it was elected; which has never included keeping me safe from myself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
your all idiots
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: your all idiots
Being a grandmother at age 35 is neat... being a great-grandmother at age 45 means that there is a problem that needs to be dealt with here. And how many people have great-great-grandmothers who are younger than 75 years old??? Hmmm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bad idea
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet is like Las Vegas
Funny thing is that people that are so concerned about internet safety and blocking it on such a high level seem to be the same people that don't seem to have any control over their personal lives or the children that they raise. They seem to be saying, "I'm not a very good parent, my kids are out of control, they don't respect me as it is, I can't handle this any longer, they should just ban the net, shut down the casinos, and put an end to late night cinemax, and the world would be a better place for me and my kids". Yeah right! That'll work won't it.
Its not my responsibility to raise your kids, because I raise my kids to a different standard than you.
Life's tuff - you can't filter it. You can however filter your own life, and hey feel free to fill it with all of your personal likes and your own standard of living. That's what life is all about.
"CHOICES" ~ There your damn kids, yo raise'em, and while your at tell them to stay out of the streets.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
filtering
it works pretty well for deciding what emails etc i'd like to see, i'd not mind a browser that poped up a page saying that based on *my* viewing habits and pages where *i've* clicked 'do not show me this again' i get a polite warning before seeing the page (with an option to view anyway).
hell you could pre load links, and flag them as 'good/not good' based on this too.
the problem is when someone else decides whats 'good/not good' and ensures their choice is mandatory.
as for protecting kids, having three myself i could have sworn that was my job, you know to be aware of what they are doing and take action if i think there is a problem.
as for problems in the land of oz.. i blame the ozone hold (joke)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
simple solution
The last time I checked, IE will block all pages that do not contain the selected content rating.
So if a page has no ratings, it's blocked.
You can also block all but whit listed pages.
Why is it so hard for people to use them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
filter everything
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I WANT 2 BLOCK MY SEX PAGE
[ link to this | view in thread ]
realestate
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: realestate
Sydney
realestate
[ link to this | view in thread ]
real estate
Suzzane Waltz
real estate
[ link to this | view in thread ]
put some filters
There are several software in the market to prevent this kind of situation.
camper trailers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
general
=========================
will smith
=========================
camper trailers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sunshine Coast real estate
[ link to this | view in thread ]