Appeals Court Recognizes Limits To On Demand Printing Patent

from the reverses-the-decision dept

Two years ago, Ingram and Amazon lost a patent battle concerning an "on demand" printing technique. Ingram had created a system that would let publishers and retailers print books in bulk -- which fits with their distribution business. However, this inventor had been able to get a patent on the idea of a quick printing machine for a single book -- designed mainly to be used within retail stores. While some may question the non-obviousness of such an idea (one that's been talked about for ages), it seems that such a device has little to do with the Ingram and Amazon's efforts... and it appears that an Appeals Court has agreed, overturning the original decision. It's good to see that the court didn't think that just because this guy had a patent on one small area of on-demand book printing, he could somehow claim ownership of the whole concept.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Joe Smith, 3 Apr 2006 @ 5:22pm

    Obviousness

    The thing to note is that the defendants had to go to the court of appeal to win a case which should never have been brought in the first place.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.