Google/Earthlink Lead The Pack For San Francisco's Non-Muni Muni-WiFi
from the moving-forward dept
While there's been some legitimate skepticism over the messy and haphazard process being used in San Francisco to set up a muni-WiFi offering, ever since Earthlink and Google teamed up on the bid, most people considered them the clear front-runners. So, it's barely worth mentioning that, indeed, the city has announced that the combined Earthlink/Google proposal makes the most sense. Of course, what's most interesting here is that it highlights how muni-WiFi is not really muni-WiFi. Almost every so-called "muni-WiFi" offering is really a commercial, for-profit, venture. The only "muni" aspect to it is that the city is handing over rights-of-way to place access points, demanding some measure of ubiquitous coverage and reasonable pricing for less well-off citizens while also looking for ways that public service officials can benefit from the service as well. The real question will be just how willing the winners of these systems will be to open their networks up to others. In this deal, Earthlink is effectively opening up the network they would build to Google to offer a free, ad-supported WiFi that would in some ways compete with Earthlink's own cheap, but still fee-based, WiFi. This is also the same model Earthlink is using in Philadelphia, where it has won that city's "muni-WiFi" bid. In a lot of ways, this makes the most sense. It doesn't make sense for every potential provider to go around getting the right-of-way rights and putting up access points -- but if the local government is going to let one commercial entity do so, why not allow them to let other providers offer service on that network at a reasonable price as the tradeoff? While we're still not convinced that muni-WiFi is the right technology for the job, it is good to see that the various muni-WiFi offerings are increasingly being agreed to under more reasonable terms than many critics originally envisioned.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Pardon me Mr. Rockefeller
Or does it? I'm sorry but forgive me for not pointing what appears to be a monopoly in the making. It is not my intention here to explain capitalism in detail, but it is worth mentioning perhaps that it is based on this concept we like to call competition. Perhaps one would like some fortunate conglomerate to oversee the importation of petroyleum? Perhaps this would be of some convenience to the american consumer? Only in an environment that is contigent upon competition do consumers really benefit, muni or no muni.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ownerless wireless mesh
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Pardon me Mr. Rockefeller
Heh. If you read us often enough, it should be pretty damn clear that we believe strongly in free markets and competition. However, there is something called a natural monopoly. Allowing everyone to put up their own access points creates more problems and more expenses than it solves.
And, in NO way does having muni rights of way create a monopoly on internet access. Already you have the ability to get DSL or cable. Increasingly there's cellular access wherever you need it as well. This is just one more method, but due to the low range of WiFi, it requires gov't approval for right of way.
So, explain how this creates a monopoly?
Petroleum import isn't a natural monopoly is it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fonforall
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: fonforall
[ link to this | view in thread ]
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain World Domination.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: fonforall
[ link to this | view in thread ]