Do New VC Funds Spend Cash Faster?

from the just-wondering dept

Tue, Apr 25th 2006 1:06pm — Mike Masnick

It's no secret that VCs have started opening up the purse strings quite a bit in the last year or so... but there seems to be a debate as to why. An article about the rise of VC fundings in the Pacific Northwest says that the reason is because so many VCs have just raised new funds, and are eager to invest them. The argument sounds compelling... until you look back at the last cycle of VC deals. In the 2000 and 2001 time frame, a lot of VCs raised a tremendous amount of money just as the last dot com and telco bubbles were collapsing... and then they sat on the cash. Then, the complaint was that these firms had no urgency to invest, since many funds have 10 year lifespans. It seems more likely that the recent funding boom is based on a combination of factors, that include both the new funds, the older funds who are suddenly getting more desperate to put that "old" money to work, and (most importantly) signs that the market is picking up again... even if there are questions about why.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

6 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 25 Apr 2006 @ 1:35pm

VC Limited Partners (investors) get tired of seeing a half-dozen guys drawing $1 million-plus salaries (not to mention carried interest on the upside) while not making investments for the portfolio. There is enormous pressure to be active in order to avoid overhead reductions (thinning the partnership herd or cutting their take-home pay).

There is a strong bias toward putting the money to work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 25 Apr 2006 @ 1:57pm

How bout when you write an article you state exactly what the acronym is, so you can reach a wider audience... VC? in my world it means Virtual Circuit, how bout yours?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
discojohnson, 25 Apr 2006 @ 2:17pm

Re:
venture capitalist. i think techdirt needs to have one of those javascript hover links over common stuff like that. i understand the frustration, too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris Kirschke, 25 Apr 2006 @ 2:19pm

VC $$$
Don't forget that they have to give the money back if they don't put it to work...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike (profile), 25 Apr 2006 @ 2:23pm

Re: VC $$$
Don't forget that they have to give the money back if they don't put it to work...

But they have plenty of time...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kevin, 25 Apr 2006 @ 3:47pm

Acronyms
I read techdirt to get a different perspective on the world. I am in the IT field, but am no where close to knowing every acronym for every company/culture/society. For us dumb people out there, please please please give the term once in the article, then use the acronym. Thank you for all the great articles.
[ link to this | view in thread ]