Will Software As Services Wipe Out The Software Piracy Question?
from the one-way-for-it-to-work dept
Last week, at the CATO event on copyrights, I mentioned that the oddest presentation came from a lawyer from the BSA, the software industry association best known for putting out bogus numbers every year on software piracy that even the company that manages the study admits the BSA is misrepresenting their results. Lately, the BSA and its member companies have been targeting misleading attacks on places like Indonesia and China -- in both cases, where the use of counterfeit software may be high, but the industry wants to ignore that there may be benefits to such unauthorized use (including building in the network effects necessary to make that software the de facto standard as well as helping some small businesses get off the ground with lower initial costs -- helping them to later succeed and build up the economy). So, it was no surprise to hear the BSA give a misleading talk at the event last week. However, after the event, I had an interesting conversation with a friend, wondering why the BSA isn't a much stronger supporter of web-based "software as services" initiatives, since the whole question of counterfeit software pretty much goes away when the software company in question manages the computers on which the software is installed. It appears that Ian Sefferman is thinking along the same lines, pointing out that as more firms go to software as services setups, the whole question of software "piracy" goes away. Of course, so would the side-benefits of that "piracy" as well -- which could explain one element holding this back. In the past, even Bill Gates has admitted that all of that software copying helped get Microsoft's software entrenched. Completely giving up those benefits may not be in their best interests... even if it gets rid of the "problem."Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So is it better to run software as a service money-wise? Yes and no, just another environment the technology allows. Not a revolution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
calling it piracy is ignorant, and pejorative.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: theft != unauthorised copying != piracy
the act of unlawfully taking the property of another with intent to permanently deprive the other of such property.
piracy [n] [abs]
taking a seafaring vessel, by force, on the high seas, without the authority of a soverign state.
it is not *possible* to commit software theft or piracy. they simply cannot exist.
when was the last time you heard of a group of merciless armed men overpowering the crew of a piece of software, and sailing it to an unknown port?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: theft != unauthorised copying != piracy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Boy, Those Apples Sure Aren't Like Oranges...
In any case, software use is probably analogous to internet use -- control/censorship is treated as an error, and the system shunts around it. If I'm given a choice between using software for free and using an online service for a charge, I'll use the free software. If I'm only given the choice to use the online service, I'll perform my tasks some other way or not at all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Adobe Photoshop
Seems that this use of a client side program would also fit into software as a service / anti-piracy. If you are connected to the web the app pings home with the IP address, and serial number (or something along those lines).
That way you do not have to concern yourself with the physical sofwtare, just the use of it.
(FWIW I would rather just use Linux than software as a service.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, it won't stop piracy
So, while a person cannot physically copy and install the application as a service, they WILL find ways to cicumvent the registration and subscription logic. I.e. give away free registrations to users or find ways of unlocking the service for unpaid usage, or simply share registration usernames and passwords.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who cares?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]