Napster Follows Real's Lead: Pretends To Go Free
from the makes-for-a-good-headline dept
The story is too rich for the press to ignore: Napster is going free again. So, the headlines coming out all play up this aspect of the story, and it's only when you read the details that you realize
Napster isn't actually going free. Instead, it's picked up on the (not very successful) marketing gimmick that RealNetworks put in place almost exactly a year ago. If you
announce you're giving away free music to compete with file sharing networks, the press will play it up. It works even better in Napster's case, given the Napster brand's "history" as the original big name file sharing app. The reality, though, is that (just like Real's "free music") Napster is simply offering a limited promotion of free music -- in this case, the promotion lets you listen to any song five times before you have to pay up. It's not a bad promotional idea, of course, but it's a long way from free music. The "free" music will also come with advertising, which leads to the fact that the only way Napster was allowed to do this was to agree to share the advertising revenue with the record labels. In other words, to
promote songs to the music buying public, Napster has to give up a share of its own revenue. And people wonder why most of these services are having trouble getting anywhere.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Whatever. Thanks for the lesson Milke. No one knew that headlines didn't tell the whole story until you were awesome enough to point it out (for the 12,000th time).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
But five plays of a song? How about 50 over a 30-day period?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RE:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
(not quite as simple as that.. but this has so much potential for abuse. ;) )
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: tune bite
Thanks
Kerry
[ link to this | view in thread ]
USA Only
[ link to this | view in thread ]