If You Can Promote The Movie Yourself, What Is The Studio Doing?

from the isn't-that-what-the-studio-is-for? dept

As the movie studios like to complain about how the internet is impacting their business, it seems that they're (again) not quite getting how it can help their business as well. Reuters has a nice little story about how a first time director used MySpace to drum up buzz about her film. The basic story, by itself, isn't that interesting. What is interesting is that Walt Disney's Touchstone Pictures was supposed to be promoting the film. However, since they pretty much had decided it was going to be a small time film, they didn't put much effort into it. It was only a couple weeks before the movie came out that Touchstone finally realized something was going on and took over the MySpace page. If part of the "benefit" the big movie studios pitch is their ability to promote your movie widely, it's somewhat damning to find out that the director seemed to do a much better job on her own just using MySpace. It certainly seems to call into question the purpose of going with such a big studio for promotions.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Ben, 3 May 2006 @ 2:53pm

    Hey Mike...

    I think you've got a gramatical error in that first sentence bud.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2006 @ 2:54pm

    Promotion is only a portion; what about financing, venues, etc?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    GDog, 3 May 2006 @ 3:04pm

    Isn't this like the trifecta of incompetence? It seems completely obvious that the MPAA or the RIAA has no purpose whatsoever. Outside of taking too much money and ramping up our prices to the point of mass piracy, they appear to have no value at all. They trample artists' rights, not protect them, they pay radio stations to play music that has no right to be made in the first place while decent artists go hungry, and they try to 'jack the consumers to the point of rebellion. There have been genocidal tyrants that have more value than these guys.

    GDog

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Danno, 3 May 2006 @ 3:06pm

    The biggest holdback for independent films right now is distribution, no doubt.

    If the theatrer companies weren't so ginormously huge, small fries might have a chance in hell of getting their movies onto a decent number of screens.

    That is not the case.

    However, given home theatre rivaling real theatres, and internet distribution... Hey, who knows?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Charles Scalfani, 3 May 2006 @ 3:32pm

    No need for the studios

    What is needed for any film AFTER it's been made is distribution and marketing.

    The Internet gives anyone a distribution channel for anything digital. No need for the theaters (unless you really think you're going to get an academy award) and hence no need for the studios for distribution.

    Looks like MySpace, YouTube and Google Video are giving people the marketing arm that was previously unavailable. So, no need for the studios for marketing.

    And with studios pushing a lot of the financing down onto the production companies, no need for the studios for financing.

    Looks like there's no need for the studios ;-)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Tom Deaderick, 3 May 2006 @ 4:07pm

    Trifecta of incompetence

    I've not heard that before. It's catchy.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    kerry, 3 May 2006 @ 5:05pm

    Re:

    I agree

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    inboxnews, 3 May 2006 @ 5:42pm

    Stick-it

    ~from the article:

    "Box Office Mojo forecast that "Stick It" would make $5.7 million, the movie surprised box-office observers by collecting $11 million and a $5,301 per-screen average when it opened last weekend."

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2006 @ 9:02pm

    Internet distribution + bandwidth

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 3 May 2006 @ 9:04pm

    internet distribution isnt much good if you cant get a server and a nice fat pipe for high bandwidth to support at least a few hundred people downloading it at the same time, and the wallet to support that fat bandwidth bill

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Tashi, 3 May 2006 @ 10:44pm

    Stick it is actually a neat little movie with heavy overtones (how divorce affects girls) that skirted by the usual teen movie cliches. The trailers make it seem like Bring It On (same writer) but in fact the two have nothing in common. I really liked it. I think the low forecast may have been because Stick It is a hard movie to fit in a box, which I guess means they had a hard time matching a demographic to it.

    I saw a related article on Yahoo! about the decline of actor's salaries. Big time actors aren't bringing in the crowds. Sited was Jim Carrey, Eddie Murphy and Nicole Kidman as actors that carry a hefty price tag (20mil range) whose recent films have been financial flops. Also sited is Jake Gyllenhaal (Jarhead, Brokeback) who at $5 mil a movie is considered a steal.

    Old business models die hard. Hollywood is changing, hopefully for the better.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 4 May 2006 @ 5:35am

    internet distribution isnt much good if you cant get a server and a nice fat pipe for high bandwidth to support at least a few hundred people downloading it at the same time, and the wallet to support that fat bandwidth bill


    Well you could always make a deal with youtube or google and use them for the distribution. They get all those users and you get your content distributed. Maybe they will barter users for distribution or maybe will ask for a small percentage of the gross, but in any case going this route will probably end up being cheaper and get you more exposure

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    Thomas Barrasso, 2 Jul 2009 @ 8:17am

    Don't go out before you get your Mojo!

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.