If You Can Promote The Movie Yourself, What Is The Studio Doing?
from the isn't-that-what-the-studio-is-for? dept
As the movie studios like to complain about how the internet is impacting their business, it seems that they're (again) not quite getting how it can help their business as well. Reuters has a nice little story about how a first time director used MySpace to drum up buzz about her film. The basic story, by itself, isn't that interesting. What is interesting is that Walt Disney's Touchstone Pictures was supposed to be promoting the film. However, since they pretty much had decided it was going to be a small time film, they didn't put much effort into it. It was only a couple weeks before the movie came out that Touchstone finally realized something was going on and took over the MySpace page. If part of the "benefit" the big movie studios pitch is their ability to promote your movie widely, it's somewhat damning to find out that the director seemed to do a much better job on her own just using MySpace. It certainly seems to call into question the purpose of going with such a big studio for promotions.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Hey Mike...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
GDog
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If the theatrer companies weren't so ginormously huge, small fries might have a chance in hell of getting their movies onto a decent number of screens.
That is not the case.
However, given home theatre rivaling real theatres, and internet distribution... Hey, who knows?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No need for the studios
The Internet gives anyone a distribution channel for anything digital. No need for the theaters (unless you really think you're going to get an academy award) and hence no need for the studios for distribution.
Looks like MySpace, YouTube and Google Video are giving people the marketing arm that was previously unavailable. So, no need for the studios for marketing.
And with studios pushing a lot of the financing down onto the production companies, no need for the studios for financing.
Looks like there's no need for the studios ;-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Trifecta of incompetence
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Stick-it
"Box Office Mojo forecast that "Stick It" would make $5.7 million, the movie surprised box-office observers by collecting $11 million and a $5,301 per-screen average when it opened last weekend."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet distribution + bandwidth
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I saw a related article on Yahoo! about the decline of actor's salaries. Big time actors aren't bringing in the crowds. Sited was Jim Carrey, Eddie Murphy and Nicole Kidman as actors that carry a hefty price tag (20mil range) whose recent films have been financial flops. Also sited is Jake Gyllenhaal (Jarhead, Brokeback) who at $5 mil a movie is considered a steal.
Old business models die hard. Hollywood is changing, hopefully for the better.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well you could always make a deal with youtube or google and use them for the distribution. They get all those users and you get your content distributed. Maybe they will barter users for distribution or maybe will ask for a small percentage of the gross, but in any case going this route will probably end up being cheaper and get you more exposure
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don't go out before you get your Mojo!
[ link to this | view in thread ]