Needed: Prize For Best Use Of Prizes To Spur Innovation

from the everybody-wins dept

Using prizes to spur innovation continues to gain in popularity. Two new contests, one to promote fuel efficiency and another to develop a new lunar lander, are in the works from the X-Prize Foundation, which previously had sponsored a contest for private space travel. The model is intriguing because it promotes competition, while spreading the R&D costs among several different organizations, each with a lot at stake. However, the use of prizes is not without its detractors. Some point out that there's already a prize called profit for people who develop technology. That's sometimes true, but there's often a disconnect between the ability to innovate and the ability to execute and turn a profit; perhaps if these inventors can be rewarded with monetary prizes, there will be no need for the patent-and-sue strategy. A deeper problem may be the fact that technology often develops in completely unexpected ways, creating its own demand. Economists know this as Say's Law. The most impressive innovations probably won't come from the heads of contest organizers, but from researchers pursuing their own interests. Still, as long as there's going to be research driven by the public interest (sponsored by governments and other non-profit interests), having researchers compete is a promising model.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Adam Brown, 8 May 2006 @ 9:11am

    Overlooking one other thing

    I think that a lot of what makes these competitions work is that there is a winner. Competitive behavior drives man to create many things and taste of victory is just as important as the financial reward. These competitions also have the benefit of great public relations. Sure, a company could come up with something amazing on their own but if they do it for a competition and win they get lots of extra press for it.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    dorpus, 8 May 2006 @ 10:10am

    Should winners be killed?

    Will the internet spawn innovative serial killers who target very specific kinds of people? I imagine bird watchers would be easy to off in the woods, kite flyers could
    be decapitated with kite lines, scrabble players could be asphyxiated with scrabble pieces, bridge players could be lying dead in the cardinal directions, stamp collectors could have their faces glued on to albums, fishermen could be gutted, paintballers could be shot with real guns, yachters could have their skin flapping in the wind, chess players could be blown up with time-bomb chess clocks, Techdirt readers... er, we won't go there. ;P

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Jim Harper, 8 May 2006 @ 10:17am

    Paying for Prizes

    When the USG puts up the money for a prize, Americans pay twice: once as taxpayers and a second time as consumers. According to WashingtonWatch.com The H-Prize costs the average family 35 cents - a small price, until you realize the hundreds of other projects that taxpayers are funding.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Joe, 8 May 2006 @ 10:28am

    Re: Paying for Prizes

    Jim,
    We're in agreement that the government funds all kinds of wasteful projects (some are research, some are just pure pork). But as long as the government is going to be involved in directing research at all (the wisdom of which can be debated), it seems like a good thing that it's moving more towards the prize model, as opposed to the grants model.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Jim Harper, 8 May 2006 @ 10:38am

    Re: Re: Paying for Prizes

    Agreed. And, hey, putting the H-Prize in a free-standing bill at least allows for a little transparency and debate on all these topics.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Joe Smith, 8 May 2006 @ 4:25pm

    Between the stools

    Prizes or direct government research may be appropriate for those challenges where an inventor cannot patent and capture the value of his invention either because the idea cannot be patented at all or any patent cannot be enforced because it can be directly implemented by users.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.