Hollywood's DRM Obsession Continues To Hold It Back
from the or-how-to-hamper-your-business dept
In the fallout from the news that Warner Bros. plans to use BitTorrent to distribute movies, many people have noticed the shortcomings of the service that Mike pointed out, such as the fact that downloaded films can only be viewed on computers, and are (again) noting that the entertainment industries are taking a completely reactive strategy to digital technology. Their actions are predicated more on stopping the loss of sales from physical formats, than realizing they can actually grow their overall businesses by embracing technology, offering new services and innovating their business models. The BitTorrent plan might be a furtive first step down this path, but that idea is belied by the restrictions on the downloaded content. Tim Lee points to a post by our good friend Patrick Ross, where he says he won't use the new service because, like previous movie download offerings, the restrictions make it rather pointess. Ross rightly says that he should be able to move the content onto the device of his choice, like with music. Lee's response is also on the money: that the ease with which people can do this with music is because the CD predates DRM, and that had the music industry been able to control the licensing of necessary DRM technology -- like the movie industry has -- the rate of innovation would have slowed and the market would still be waiting on products that support new business models, like MP3 players. This is what's going on with movies, where, as Lee again says, Hollywood's stranglehold and obsession with stopping piracy at the expense of usability has prevented the advent of any decent (or successful) movie download services. Clearly Ross understands how using copy protection and DRM makes content less valuable, which is a little surprising coming from somebody who calls himself "a believer in DRM". He's also supported the idea that consumers can "vote with their wallets" when it comes to DRM -- just as he himself has done, meaning Warner Bros.' heavy restrictions have cost it a customer. This illustrates the folly of current entertainment thinking, and the industry's reliance on DRM: it would rather assuage its paranoia about potential losses to piracy, than deliver useful products that will grow its business.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This is irony, my friends: In their attempts to stop downloads and increase DVD sales, they're doing the oppisite; Increasing downloads and decreasing DVD sales
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MORE DRM, lawsuits, etc
ALSO be aware that there are currently 2 bills in congress attempting to amend/change the already PRO-industry
dmca copyright act;;
1) new laws:
http://markbnj.blogspot.com/2006/04/bigbrother-fight-hollywood-fight-new.html
2) new RIAA/FCC board member:
http://markbnj.blogspot.com/2006/04/tech-riaa-gets-first-public-official.html
and 3: make sure to write to your congresspeople about this
AND also write to them that you are upset that the President of the (once) united states is TAKING away the POWERS of the CONGRESS as stated in the CONSTITUTION...
See:
http://markbnj.blogspot.com/2006/05/politics-white-house-lies-again-and.html
mark
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: MORE DRM, lawsuits, etc
Not to start an argument, but plenty of people on both sides of the fence hate DRM, and plenty of people on both sides are trying to expand it as well. Why fragment the pro-digital-freedom team with party affiliation crap?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]