$100 Laptops To Create Next Generation Of Malware Authors?
from the wishful-thinking dept
The head of anti-virus research for Kaspersky Labs says that sending cheap laptops to poor nations could help create a huge class of malware authors as an unintended consequence. While it's true that people don't often enough consider unintended consequences, these comments seem to ignore the main idea behind providing people with cheap laptops or other computing devices -- economic empowerment. It's inevitable that some people will use the devices for nefarious purposes, it's hard to see the economic benefits of such activities -- when compared to the legitimate economic opportunities the programs are intended to create -- being attractive enough to create a large-scale problem. There have been online extortion scams and other financially driven malware schemes, but the spread of computers and net connectivity into poorer nations isn't creating a widespread plague. Perhaps when you work in the anti-virus and security industry you're conditioned to expect the worst of people, but to think that giving poor people cheap computers will make them all into hackers is a bit extreme.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
first post?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: first post?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: first post?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyway, I doubt the real problem with this is going to be a bunch of new malware writers, as much as it's going to be a new onslaught of gullible victims who not going to know any better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ph34r M3!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ph34r M3!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hackers?
How could it lead to malware, they don't even have malls!
sorry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: first post?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Linux based system!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Linux based system!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Linux based system!
The simple fact is that these will be bought and used by schools in third world countries and not mass marketed.
Yes a few of them will be black marketed but not enough to cause that type of panic.
This is just another Anti-Virus company/MS FUD tactic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Linux based system!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Linux based system!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bulgaria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Bulgaria
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Sorry guys. Us rich folks are afraid you might write malware."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Exactly
Sometimes I think we take everything that people with money do as being a giant conspiracy againsh those without. Rather than sit around and complain about how bad everything is, I'm planning on getting off my ass and making it for myself. If your too lazy to do that, and enjoy being the apathetic corporate drone, then shut up about how the man is keeping you down. A little initiave is all it takes.
Ok, now back to the article...umm if you expect the worst from people then you'll probably see/get it. I know I'm still young and optimistic, but I still think that there is (at least some) good in people.
The rant is officially over...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
I'm not saying those that have things all want to keep those that don't in the same position. What I am saying is that there is ample reason to rid yourself of potential threats of your power.
This is coming from another not-yet-rich-middle-class-young person... and when my research company takes off, I'll encourage innovation, but I won't be throwing away the company to do so. It's competition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Exactly
You said that you would encourage innovation, but not at the cost of competition, and I agree. However, more of what I was meaning was that in areas not directly competing with you, why would you want to hold people back? Let them make more $$$ which can eventually be spent on your goods/services.
Didn't think I was going to get this much debate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Exactly
I know that not everyone is capable/would even want to be the people at the top. As a result, there is room enough at the top for those that want to get there.
Now, for everyone that just doesn't want to be there...STOP COMPLAINING about how they make more money than they are worth, give themselves silver parachutes, etc. You have the same opportunity to do it, you CHOOSE not to, period.
One classic example of the whining I hate is whenever a tax-cut for the rich is proposed. People get all up in arms about "why should THEY get a break"... they can afford it...blah blah blah. First of all, THEY are providing most of the $$$ into the system AND they aren't getting the most of the benefit. The gov't parasites that ARE lazy, want handouts because its their "right" cost the population in general a HUGE amount of money.
Now, as far as calling everyone on this post lazy, that wasn't the case. I was just saying that you are (in general) going to get out of life what you put into it. If you really don't care, just living day-to-day, etc then that is all great and good, just don't expect to enjoy the same benefits the people that are busting their asses do.
Now on to the post later that was talking about how people aren't talking about the article. Sorry that the rant was a little off-topic, however, it was directed at what I feel is the heart of the matter.
There will almost be uninteneded consequences for anything that is released to the general public. However, that is what makes things interesting. Google gave people 2 gig of email, then people create programs that could create a virtual mountable harddrive based on the storage. Instead of getting all pissy, taking their toys and going home...what did they do? They just indexed what people were putting on there, did data-mining, and gave their advertising customers an even better profile of those type of users.
Point being, if all you do is fear the unintended consequnces then your going to spend more time and resources on counter-measures and unproductive actions. If you embrace them, and look for ways to improve then everyone will benefit.
If malware does stem from these, then that probably means that there was financial incentive to do it. So, just create open contests of ways to prevent it. Instead of letting the few bad apples ruin it for everyone, give the others a chance to help themselves...benefit for everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
Damn, those kids just seem to know EVERYTHING!
Idealism is so cute.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
It's great that you aspire to better living, but you are in the same boat as all the rest of us in our declining economies here. Have you noticed that our western countries don't actually do anything any longer? We have no primary industry or manufacturing, the service sector has been taken by immigrant labor and we are promised a new age of information economics. So what is *our* role in that economy? If you think it is as producers, think again.
You need to think clearly about what those who use the term "information economy" really mean by those two words. Do they mean that we will produce and process information as our contribution to the global economy? That we will all become shareholders in our collective IP? No. They mean that information will replace money as currency. Those with the information and access to it will be "rich" and those without it will be "poor", and since information is power the status quo is preserved. So, holding on to power is about constricting and controlling means of others empowerment, in this case preventing 3rd world citizens accessing powerful information processing devices. Now, the idea of a global information economy is so flawed that it is a distaster of appocolyptic proportions in the making, but that is a discussion for another day, in the here and now you must realise that people like yourself, the hard working, aspiring middle classes have the most to lose by allowing a powerful elite to consolidate control over free exchange of information. Handing out the tools of information empowerment to poor citizens is anathema to people who subscribe to these twisted theories.
To help you make sense of it, analyse the context of this article. On the face of it an anti-malware company should be delighted by the emergence of new potential source of malware. It's in their best interests to just shut up about it and hope that they are right. Why would they make this statement? Making this public statement is counter to their interests, ergo they are, as "experts" behaving as actors disseminating paid for propaganda by other interests. Of course since we know information is valuable, in this case the gold is in finding who has been talking to Kaspersky labs recently.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Exactly
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Racism by another name
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No more computers for poor people!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also, the US government is wanting ISP's to start keeping records of everyone's online activities. Who's going to watch these third world people? We can't trust their governments to do it properly. The poor villager of today could turn into the international terrorist of tomorrow given a computer. Next thing you know, we're seein' mushroom clouds over America. Does anyone want to see that? No, of course not. Better to keep them away from things like computers and the internet. Better safe than sorry.
And finally there's the specter of third world file sharing popping up. How're the **AA and other copyright holders supposed to deal with that? Piracy's bad enough over there already.
Unless, of course, these things come with some kind of non-removable DRM and monitoring software built in. I bet trusted companies like M$, Sony, and Intel could get together and whip something up like that. Then it would be OK.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not the $100 laptop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not the $100 laptop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's not the $100 laptop
No, but it does have "second-hand PCs", and how many used Macs do you think that includes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's not the $100 laptop
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The world is truly going to end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who cares if there's more malware coming out of this, only aol users, general idiots, and soccer moms(or dads) will actually be affected by these scams - and they're being affected whether the malware was developed in California or Somalia, it doesn't make a difference.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
grow up yall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who will give me $100?
If I was living on the streets poor or had no job poor, I would not spend my time learning the computer, to scam some American. I would be selling that Laptop, to the next American that came to my country, or just not even get one.
There is nothing like cash money when you have to feed your self or your family.
Everyone has their panties in a bunch for nothing. pfft.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Who will give me $100?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What *REALLY* worries anti-virus companies...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow....
i commend anyone who actually commented on the article and didnt partake in the childish games like the first post thing, and then the kid that called everyone lazy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: wow....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You have got to be kidding..
Hell we have a whole country of dis-enchanted youths with high powerd computers, High speed Links, Unlimited time, and unlmited research ability, a much more likely construct.
Cheap laptops, IE crap no one in a 1st world country could put up with.
Hey if they get them, will they learn to speak/read english, to use them?
Hey! when they go to work for Dell at least we might be able to understand them.
Suck them all into our world of High tech electronics, that they have to upgrade constantly, instead of buying food, housing, they could be spending their hard earned wages buying WOW monthly fee's too
Fearmongers UNITE !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Of couse educating people is empowering them. In any population, some people are not nice and will misuse any opportunity. In the same vein, most are normal folks who merely want an opportunity to acheive but another small percentage will be the brilliant ones who may help improve the world.
These are the same types of outcomes that public libraries afforded in the United States. Keeping everyone uneducated, to me, seems a stupid way to avoid risk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
folks are missing the point
but what people are missing is that the socio-economic climate in those countries will not change as quickly as the people will be empowered... there will not be an existing framework of high tech jobs for those empowered people to go into... they will have to build their industries from whatever state they're currently in in order to make room for all those newly empowered people and that will take time...
in the mean time you'll have a bunch of people with the means to do more technical work, and the expectation that they should be able to do it but no actual employment opportunities that would satisfy those expectations... when one has a large disparity between expectations and opportunities to fulfill those expectations one of the social adaptations to that state is crime (it's not the only adaptation to that state and that's not the only reason crime comes about, but it is a recognized outcome)...
giving computers to poor countries is like giving a bandaid to someone with a gaping wound, it's not enough to address the problem it's intended to address and winds up having unintended consequences... the unintended consequence of cyber-empowerment without corresponding growth in opportunities could very well be cyber-crime...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cool
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]