YouTube Denies $1 Billion Valuation, But Okay with $600 Million

from the overshooting dept

Fri, Jul 28th 2006 11:33am — Carlo Longino

Earlier this week, a number of stories with the phrase "$1 billion" in close proximity to "YouTube" were winding their way through the media, after the company was apparently the belle of the ball at Herb Allen's annual Sun Valley rich-guy schmoozefest. It seems pretty clear the unprofitable company (with no appearance of a business plan) isn't worth anything near that, but all the better to fit the Skype Billion-Dollar Buyout Plan, which is based more on hype than business sense or financial performance. But YouTube's founder is clearing the air in an interview with Marketwatch, where he "brushed aside reports that the value of the company jumped to $1 billion from $600 million because of his appearance at the Allen & Co. confab". It's not clear, but the writeup makes it sound like he's okay with a $600 million valuation, but $1 billion, well, that's just ludicrous. Wow, such modesty -- a new face to the media-driven buyout plan, maybe one a willing buyer will reward with another $400 million.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

15 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Yet another Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2006 @ 11:44am

Now the best value tube of the Internet!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cheapskate, 28 Jul 2006 @ 12:50pm

Media windfall
I'd be willing to hype them for a lot less than that...say $150 million
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2006 @ 1:22pm

Please change this to the "One born every minute" department . . .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fsckr, 28 Jul 2006 @ 1:31pm

Based on??
I'm not sure I get it, what is their valuation based on?

Their millions of users?? Well I have thousands of users on my site. Can I claim its value as being in the millions? Probably not. So what I want to know is: why the elevated valuations?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
tehdirtaddict, 28 Jul 2006 @ 1:37pm

The internet is a series of tubes
if 1 is worth $600 million, how much are worth therest :D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2006 @ 2:49pm

Re: Media windfall
on what account?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You people are all wrong here..., 28 Jul 2006 @ 2:53pm

They are worth 2 Billion. The future potential of youtube is the sky.

Get a life and learn to recognize a bargain when you see one!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dude, 28 Jul 2006 @ 3:24pm

I like beer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 28 Jul 2006 @ 5:13pm

Sex Kills!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sean, 28 Jul 2006 @ 7:04pm

Wow
I'd love to be that guy. Though I can see how they valuated how it's worth 600 million. With how many users there are you could basically put some ads up there and make them pay millions of dollars just to put them on.

That's my two cents.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
thecyrusvirus, 29 Jul 2006 @ 7:21am

Re: Wow
Two cents is about what i'd pay for an ad on YouTube. Lots and lots of their video content is streamed and played through other sites and links in blogs so a large proportion of youtube bandwidth isnt even from site visitors.

They have no real target demographic or niche market so ads there will have a minute click-through rate and be to all intents and purposes pointless.

Anyone willing to pay large sums for ads on YouTube would have to be head shot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lord Gauron, 29 Jul 2006 @ 5:19pm

They could have ads in their video streams. Before the "real content".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fire Isiah NOW and save us, 30 Jul 2006 @ 3:32pm

The longer they fly solo
...the more money they will burn. The larger their viewer base, the more money they will burn. There is no economy of scale here. If the big media houses don't buy youtube out (but set up their own video sites)...then youtube is SOL. How many more years can the VCs fund them? 1 million dollar burnrate a month is what I heard. Let this sucka fly solo for another year...then we'll see it crash.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DittoBox, 30 Jul 2006 @ 10:40pm

Re: Media windfall
Screw that! I'd take 10 million! (gotta save some for a McLaren or Koenigsegg, or something more modest like an Aston Martin...)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
eric martin, 31 Jul 2006 @ 2:08pm

Youtube is worth $500 billion !!!!
Easily !

Everyone loves crappy low res macromedia flash movies !
[ link to this | view in thread ]