How Many Video Sharing Sites Does Time Warner Need?

from the six,-apparently dept

Tue, Aug 1st 2006 11:45am — Joseph Weisenthal

Earlier this week, in commenting on Time Warner's new push into online video we said that if efforts weren't coordinated across its different brands then the company was even more screwed up than we thought. Well, Om Malik has a good rundown of the different plans, and it looks far worse than we could have imagined. All told the company has investments in or partnerships with six different online video firms, with both AOL and CNN using different services. Even Sports Illustrated has its own video plans that are separate from the rest of the company. It seems that after all these years since its disastrous merger, the company is no closer to unifying or leveraging its different brands. One of the few advantages a large integrated company has is the ability to achieve economies of scale. GE, for instance, can negotiate discounts with parts suppliers that its divisions couldn't do on its own. A media company, like Time Warner, should take advantage of network effects by having its properties and brands work together -- otherwise it might as well break up and let each division compete for itself, unencumbered by the massive bureaucracy that comes with such a big company.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

5 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 1 Aug 2006 @ 11:55am

Much better angle
This article so much more on point than the one from "earlier this week" that insulted itself by complaining about too much competition in a free market.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rebulican Gun, 1 Aug 2006 @ 12:22pm

How many?
Two.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wire Cramped, 1 Aug 2006 @ 1:13pm

wait a second...
Isnt Time Warner in a battle on the side of the RIAA? Arent they part of hunting down people for doing internet based media content?

Now is there some sort of conflict in interest here? I mean do they own any portion of any company that does something that they would sue over?

Makes me want to dig into that bloated ass company a little deeper!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Obvious to me, 1 Aug 2006 @ 3:16pm

Split up for a reason?
Seems to me that keeping all of these companies seperate but under one control allows Time Warner to control as much media as they can without those pesky anti-trust laws to worry about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 May 2007 @ 6:18am
  
  Re: Split up for a reason?
  Got it in one. Conformity would be a sign of anti-trust violations to come. With each part of Time Warner acting separately they can avoid anti-trust laws and get their hands in as many media cookie jars as possible
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]