Forget The Government, AOL Exposes Search Queries To Everyone
from the have-fun-with-it... dept
Remember back in January when Google got all that praise for resisting the federal government's effort to collect a big batch of search queries for a separate case? Google got all sorts of praise for supposedly protecting the privacy of its users, even as many other companies turned over the data. Among those who turned over the data without question was AOL. Apparently, they've figured that, if the government has such data, why shouldn't everyone else? Perhaps they just figured that the government was likely to leak the data anyway. No matter what the reasoning, they've decided to simply hand it out themselves for "research" purposes to anyone who might want it. SiliconBeat points us to someone who noticed the release of search logs from 500,000 unlucky AOL users. While the data had been made somewhat anonymous by replacing usernames with numbers, in plenty of cases the data is clear enough to work out who the user is. It seems that the outrage over this has convinced AOL to pull down the data, but plenty of copies are already out there. It's really quite stunning, given the debate just months ago about the importance of Google protecting this data, that anyone at AOL would think it was a good idea to basically release the same exact type of data into the public, exposing the private searches of thousands.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They never learn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
idiots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: idiots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: idiots
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So what is the worst possible thing somebody's sea
AOL has kindly replaced these people’s screenname with a sequential integer but I am guessing if you went to that church, Chamber of Commerce, or Rotary chapter you would be able to pick an English teacher with that surname.
Maybe he made all those searches and deserves to be found out. Maybe he shares one internet connection with his son. Maybe his nextdoor neighbour steals his WiFi. In any case, I expect that the free AOL CD he picked up a while ago might have suddenly become pretty expensive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do they still exist? Are they a concern? Or maybe not because they don't do it in bulk? Or do they filter the data first?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not that I was considering it in the first place..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lmfao
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lmfao
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Idiots that never learn. Hmmm, can idiots lea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Search Engine Queries
can be hypnotizing.
http://www.larkfarm.com/search_voyeurs.htm
Yes, I know I have no life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AOL will use the Kaiser Permanente strategy
Here is the instant recipe:
1) PR department reaches out to their media contacts. Journalists then tell sensationalist story of "hackers" or "bloggers" who mirrored *your* private data. AOL worms out of responsibility for letting the data loose in the first place by declaring war on the evil bloggers.
2) Now that there's no public support for the blogger, AOL can safely trick a government agency into publicly denouncing the blogger. Since the blogger is clearly a danger to public safety, the government is allowed to ignore all applicable law. After all their heart was in the right place, and that matter's more than an individual's rights. Also, since the press is already committed to portraying the blogger as a villain, the government knows that they will never have to apologize if they make a mistake. The press has a vested interest not to report the error.
3) Next AOL's team of corporate lawyers will file a lawsuit. It doesn't matter if the lawsuit is frivolous - they are after the PR value of "prosecuting on behalf of the public", and reinforcing to the media that the blogger who dared link to the info is the evil one. If the blogger is poor, weak, and has no media platform of their own, then AOL might actually win the lawsuit by default, adding further legitimacy to their "public defender" posture.
4) The public doesn't understand that killing the messenger only guarantees successful cover ups in the future. And as far as I can tell, they don't care that there is a layer of people who corporations can calculate as having no Constitutional rights in this country (if a person can't defend their rights, they might as well not exist). AOL's "issues management" team is weaving these assumptions into their strategy.
Scapegoating worked for Kaiser Permanente. It'll work for AOL.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wait a minute
But then you say that you can recognize them by the logs of their search queries.
If that's so, then you know what they searched for in the first place!?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]