Other Than Some High-Profile Failures, IPO Market Doing Pretty Well

Taking The Journalists Out Of Journalism

from the replaced dept

Fri, Aug 18th 2006 8:47am — Carlo Longino

Stories about different jobs being replaced by computers have been a favorite for journalists over the years -- now it's some of those journalists being replaced by computers. The Thomson Financial news service says that it will expand the use of computers to write automated stories, mainly on things like earnings reports, which it can churn out as quickly as 0.3 seconds. These sorts of stories are the stock and trade of financial newswires, with speed and accuracy the two most important elements, so there's no reason a computer shouldn't be used to quickly digest a company's earnings report, compare the results to the previous year's, then spit out a quick story -- which typically follows a rigid format, even when written by a human. And, of course, it's cheaper than employing a small army of human writers, but Thomson says speed is the only consideration here (though surely the cost savings don't hurt), and that the system will free up reporters for more thought-intensive tasks, which is how these types of project should be approached: using technology to automate menial tasks to allow human resources to be allocated to other tasks computers can't handle. Thomson says it's been working on different types of software to write different types of stories, making us wonder how long before they release their summer rerun program, freeing up their writers for a nice mid-year break.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

11 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Beefcake, 18 Aug 2006 @ 9:19am

Prior Art
I'm pretty certain Barbara Cartwright is just a humanized-brand like Mrs. Field or Mom's Friendly Robot Company) for romance-novel writing software. Stephen King lately too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Beefcake, 18 Aug 2006 @ 9:21am

Re: Prior Art
First slacker of the post! Send my cash reward to victims of the somewhat-recent exploding capacitor disaster.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Aug 2006 @ 9:29am

This is New?
I though TechDirt writers were computers? My bad, computes have a sense of humor.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Beefcake, 18 Aug 2006 @ 9:38am

Speaking of prior art
I hope the Patent Office doesn't issue one for this. The real prior art here is Mad Libs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
chris (profile), 18 Aug 2006 @ 9:38am

foolish humans
the comments are written by computers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lay Person, 18 Aug 2006 @ 9:42am

Don't databases do this already?
Don't databases do this already?

Databases already generate reports. No, they're not stories but neither is what's mentioned in the article.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Brian, 18 Aug 2006 @ 11:25am

Just like stats...
Journalists don't need computers to take their jobs from them, they have Katie Couric.

But seriously, earnings reports are hardly stories...they're more like stats summarized into words. I wouldn't really call the folks that write those journalists. And I'm guessing they're happy to not write them.

Analyzing those reports is where it's at.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Objective Journalist, 18 Aug 2006 @ 12:17pm

It's a conspiracy
This is a conspiracy by the Bush administration to stop journalists from reporting the real news. Computers might start reporting the positive news from Iraq or might put news that would help Republicans on the front page, rather than burying it 12 paragraphs deep in a page 10 story like true, objective journalists would. I mean, computers don't hate conservatives, so how can they write the news? Leave that to the professionals!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Andrew Strasser, 19 Aug 2006 @ 2:45am

Of course...
How else could he make his money more easy... Good idea though. I'm sure it will be trendy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
martin g, 19 Aug 2006 @ 11:11am

robotic reports
I think are lot are written by robots already aren't they ?

How many times have you heard the phrase :

" . . . ended the day in positive territory " ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Dreaded Stasi, 2 Oct 2006 @ 4:30pm

Re: It's a conspiracy
Journalists do not hate conservatives. Journalists hate themselves.
[ link to this | view in thread ]