Grouper Buy Sends YouTube Billion-Dollar Buyout Plan Into Overdrive
from the fishing-for-dollars dept
YouTube has already been through one round of the Skype Billion-Dollar Plan, which didn't quite work as the company's CEO talked its takeout price down to $600 million. But it's been resurrected for a second go-round, after Sony yesterday it announced it was buying online video site Grouper for $65 million. Grouper didn't have too many users -- less than 1% market share, according to some figures -- which means YouTube must be worth $1 billion. Wait, make that $2 billion. Some people say this isn't accurate because of the copyright problems a media-company buyout of YouTube could likely bring, but that's a small nit to pick when there's the more fundamental issue that you're talking about billions of dollars for a site that's only just started its attempts to monetize its traffic. But basing a YouTube valuation on the Grouper deal is way off-base: Grouper wasn't bought for its miniscule traffic, but for its technology (as TechCrunch points out after dropping that $2 billion number), which Sony could ostensibly use to distribute content online. While YouTube's attracted a lot of traffic, and offers a cool service, its technology isn't particularly noteworthy, as is evident from the spate of copycats it's spawned. Basing a YouTube valuation on the sale of a fairly fundamentally different company isn't accurate; but somehow it's hard to believe that will matter when YouTube goes to cash that seemingly inevitable big check.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Here we go again
What was not discussed in the article is that Sony also purchased Grouper for some pretty innovative server-search tech and not just for "eyeballs."
Wish the analysts and reporters out there would just stop trying to create undeserved hype!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here we go again
Let's be serious -- does anybody really think that except for Ted Turner there is another idiot out there who would spend $1bn on a profitless company with no core technology?
Yes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Here we go again
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Grouper's Server Search Tech and YouTube's Value
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just hope...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Valuations are not child's play
Saying Grouper has x users and got $65 million therefore YouTube is worth $2 billion because it has x users is vastly oversimplifying the valuation process, which is carried out by highly-experienced professionals. As noted, Grouper is a fundamentally different business and its key asset it its technology. Obstensibly this is what Sony was interested in buying. Their consumer website is an added bonus but had that been their only asset, this deal likely wouldn't have occurred.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm amazed
Also, there are so many horror stories about huge white elephant purchases (business.com, anyone?) that you would think money men would have learned to look at old, fuddy-duddy measures such as P&L rather than some phantom number of hits.
Oh, and weren't we having this same argument about Digg just a week or so ago?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm amazed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
VC is the "culprit"
This occurs primarily because (for VC especially) they are typically mandated to put their funds to work... even if they can't find a decent business model. Because who wants to give money to a VC firm and have it just sit in the bank?
So what do these people do? They buy the company... hype it up, and look for a greater fool buyer. The dot.com days were the epitome of this thinking. It tailed off for a while, but I wonder if we may be swiging back around toward the good old days.
(And I don't particularly mind, if we get another mini-mania, that means higher paychecks for IT workers :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where is it written that Wall Street is rational?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]