Broadening Definition Of Gambling May Include Virtual Worlds
from the definition-creep dept
Stories about the large amounts of real money cycling through the in-game economies of virtual worlds have become rather common. In addition, there have been and will continue to be many vexing legal issues, as law enforcement tries to resolve the blurry boundary dividing in-game and real world activity. So it's not surprising to see a discussion on whether playing in and making money from virtual worlds constitutes gambling. This is a pretty big question, as it brings with it a host of other issues. Should it be illegal for young people to play these games, just as it's illegal for them to gamble? How should a player's profits be taxed? Should the game be banned? All this isn't even considering actual in-game casinos, such as those in Second Life. Trying to pin down a definition of gambling might be impossible, though many people might intuitively sense that playing one of these games is different than playing online blackjack. But we wouldn't have to bother with this question if the government didn't insist on heavy handed regulation of online gambling. In the meantime, the CEO of Sony, the company behind Everquest, and any other executive in this space, might want to consult with a lawyer before entering the US.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
blah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: blah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Newsflash: Cat definitely out of bag.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Newsflash: Cat definitely out of bag.
This is obviously too simple of a concept for any government official to understand. So, I do not expect any logical regulations to be developed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Entropia is definitely online gambling
It's not a bad idea, but once you figure that out it takes a lot of the enjoyment out of the game.
Now Eve-Online is another story entirely...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm....
1. The casinos? (As if the $45 billion a year casino profits isn't enough)
2. The state lotteries? (Gosh, would hate to eat into that $55 billion a year of tax-free revenue for the state coffers; however, most of that money is made from people who don't own a computer)
3. The consumer? (hmmm, anybody sophisticated enough to be an online user of a virtual world and pays for the privledge of being a member probably doesn't need the "big brother" over the shoulder)
4. Must be the politicians who are looking for some platform to distract the voters from the real issues plaguing this country!!! Like lack of educational spending, health-care, etc., etc.
Wish people in authority would focus on the real problems facing this country.... oh well, then again, guess I should just move to never-never land...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You forgot one
Most online gambling sites are based in tax havens.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If it's a loop-hole......
If I play a game in which you partake in a virtual world, and in that world there is a slot machine that pays out "credits" - can you attribute hard currency to those credits and then be taxed on them?
What if you played 2nd life, and someone created a virtual network of virtual PC's - and on that network (a "2nd life Internet" if you will) there existed a game called "3rd life". And in that game there was a virtual -virtual-PC which existed a virtual My.Yahoo! with a virtual Texas Hold'em table, and which the points could be traded in for virtual-virtual goods. And a market grew on 2nd life for 3rd life texas-hold 'em "points". And since there is already a market for 2nd life "points" in the real world, would the virtual-virtual texas hold'em be considered "gambling?".
And IF NOT: What happens if a real-world CEO gets paid a modest salary + real-world valueless gifts (I mean wouldn't honor "2nd life" points in my real-world store) of virtua-virtual -points?
Would those be taxable?
After a lengthy lunch-hour discussion, my colleques and I have deciced that it's only when those "virtual" credits are transfered into real-world cash that it becomes taxable. Since it's your time that is being invested, it would be taxed in the sameway that a contract job would be.
In terms of gambling... looks like a loop-hole to me. Otherwise real-world token-only gambling (aka just for fun) would also fall into the realm of gambling - Of course maybe that is the way to go after all the Churches that raise money via "Bingo".
-CF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Real earning from virtual playing is already taxed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Online -> Real World Income
If the game results in some tangible "real world" benefit, even if it's something like additional hours of online play, then it's likely income of some sort, and likely could be taxed. Prizes which are internal to the game and can't be translated into real-world valuata isn't.
Content created and "bartered" within a system like Second Life will probably be taxed at some point, since the US Government doesn't like barter without taxation. I know there's forms for income derived from HOBBY activity.
Given the current "how can we get our piece of this?" mindset of the governments, there's going to be something. I'd not be suprised for someplace like Ohio (which expects me to pay USE TAX if I buy something online and have it sent as a gift to family members in another state) to try to charge USE TAX for fees paid to online games/services.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: Real earning from virtual playing is already t
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Then isn't starting a web-based business of any sort also online gambling, since you're putting money in with the hope (but not guarantee) of getting a return on that money?
This has reached ludicrous speed, cap'n.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Virtual Gambling
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
#4
but anywho.. this is a tricky one..
if I bet a few isk on.. say.. an alliance tourney..is that Illegal gambling? and if I win a couple billion, whats my taxable percentage? where are my writeoffs for repair, medical services, clone implantation.. can I deduct that from my tax? its only fair.. and do I evemail my 1040 EZ to "Uncle Sam" (must be in BoB) or just directly wire the isk?
for an online world.. cooked up by nutty icelandic shark-eaters. run on european servers. played by people on every part of the world (except antarctica, but only because they have terrible lag and thin pipes)
oh how I wish lawmakers and policy choosers had something better to do. they already slammed down with their iron fist in outrage and fury! .. and only managed to isolate and outrage the people they are trying to control, forcing them Out of areas where they could be controlled and taxed, and into a near untouchable black market.
seems like gub'mint does this all the time.. who pays for it? you and me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]