Another Patent For Pissing Off TV Viewers
from the just-what-people-wanted dept
For all the stories about how TV execs are freaking out about people skipping TV commercials thanks to their TiVos, what's been more interesting is to see the technology scramble to deal with this. Earlier this year, we pointed to Phillips' patent on banning fast forwarding (or channel surfing) and now Engadget points out that a guy in the UK has patented a system for showing ads even as you fast forward. Never mind the fact that people have talked about such things for years (raising the ever popular "isn't that obvious?" question), but it will be interesting to see if networks follow through with this. It's already been shown that TV viewers tend to remember commercials better, even if they fast forward through them -- but it also seems likely to annoy people if they feel that the networks and advertisers are trying to shove more ads in their face when they're obviously trying to get around them. Instead of looking for ways to annoy more people, why not focus on making advertising that doesn't annoy?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ads
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wow...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TV Commercials
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Commercials
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's not just TV rant
and advertising before the start of the
movie.
I paid to see this?
The last DVD I bought had trailers at
the begining as well.
They should place the trailers at the END
of the movie (which they used to do hence
the name) so I can leave or turn off the player
if I'm not interested in viewing them.
Why do I have to FF though this crap- I've
already paid for the product. It's Simple,
they're greedy bastards who treat their
customers like cattle.
TV ads, telemarketers, trailers on purchased
video... I'm sick of it. Worst of all most of the
advertising is unimaginative, insulting, annoying
or a combination of all three.
Yeah, I'll remember an ad that irritates me and
I'll be sure to purchase a competitor's product.
Stick that in your Nielsen ratings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
annoying ads
solution - download all the tv shows you watch from bit torrent, mind you, I wonder how long it'll be untill torrent sites are putting advertising in their torrents to generate revenue..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ads
I'm going to buy toothpaste no matter what, why do I need to fund Colgates marketing costs or any of their competators. It pisses me off that we are treated like idiots, why am I going to by T-Mobile service just because Catherine Zeda Jones is on the commercial? How much do these companies spend in marketing? You better believe that those costs are passed down to consumers.
But with that said I must realize that the majority of Americans do fall for these gimics, so we must be as stupid as we're treated otherwise these marketing costs couldn't be allowed. I guess it's easier to be told what to buy rather than making up your own mind. I guess Pepsi must be better than Coke because I see more Pepsi commericals.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: annoying ads
Anything will become annoying after a while.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ads
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Ads
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That was the bait....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Alternate View
Non-Paid programming or "Free TV" makes their money from ads. No matter how much it annoys you, it will be there. Only two things can happen if technology allows everyone not to watch Commercials. One would be product placement, which is more annoying to me. Nothing worse that a good show (24) showing strange shots and dialoge just so you can see it is a Ford, "We would have never caught the terrorist if it were not for the 4.6 liter V8 turbo in my 2006 Ford Tempo." Two, CBS etc. will become a pay channel and then probably still advertise.
I know tech dirt and its readers probably want to find a new business model where nobody has to pay for anything and the network does not need to generate any revenue to make money.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Showtime put one of those little animations on the bottom of Notting Hill, last week. I expect to cancel ALL my premium channels in a few weeks. I'll keep digital plus, for TCM, and rely on my Escient package (up to 1,200 discs online) for movies. I love to watch movies over and over, anyway, so I'm building up my collection.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No FFWD with some DVRs
The vast majority of the time, I don't see a single commercial, not one frame of it. I wonder what patent will end up coming out to cover that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ads
In your toothpaste example, true, everyone is going to buy toothpaste. Exactly why the advertising budgets are so big for those type of products. Everyday products have no real difference, other than maybe taste, texture, color, flavor etc. therefore they must advertise immensely to get there name out to the public so that the consumers will no the products name when they go to the store.
Honestly when do people buy a product they have never heard of before? or buy things from a company whose name they have never seen? without advertising not many products would succeed because word of mouth just doesnt travel as far these days.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ads
You have to draw a distinction between marketing and advertising. Marketing is all about would be sellers being able to bring their product to the attention of potential customers. How potential buyers and sellers can find each other efficiently is fundamental to all market economies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ads
[ link to this | view in thread ]
TV ads : a solution
and is quite simple : Don't look at the TV!
I have done this for years and it is great, take
the time to do somtheing else like reading a book
surfing on the net or listening to music...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There are a few that do a good job of it, making it see-through or not through the entire program, but it can still be quite annoying. Several times it has obliterated a portion of the screen I want/need to see.
Also: stop showing me commercials for the same friggin thing 3 times in 30minutes. I will boycott your product!
2 Also: stop showing me commercials for programs that I'm currently watching! If I'm watching Mythbusters, I don't need to see a commercial about Mythbusters during the friggin Mythbusters marathon!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Continuation
It is obvious that free-to-air television is going to continue advertising third-party products - unless people begin making donations to free-to-air stations to keep them running, it is a necessity. Of coarse, the exorbitant cost of some of the programs (and by extension, the actors within them) mean that costs rise and therefore more advertisement contracts need to be signed.
Yet, the converse side of the story is that the more advertisements that are shown on a single station, the less people are likely to watch that station (and the advertisements on it), the less people will buy the advertising companies products, and the less advertisements can be afforded.
It is, however, almost a breach of fair-trade practice that commercial (or premium/paid-for) television stations, which use the implication (and in the earlier years, promise) of few or no advertisements if you pay for their service, should now be forcing advertisements into the faces of their clients. It would stand to reason that, as these companies are getting their revenue from their client-base, they would not need to seek capitol from third-party companies. But that is the nature of business - to gain as much money (and, also by extension, power) as possible.
This can continue indefinately, each person complaining to each other about how unfair it is that commercial enterprise is doing what it does - making profit at the expense of the people - but it will do nothing, except to increase everyone's individual ill-regard for these practices.
An old saying is that the empty can rattles the most. Until people are prepared to stand up for what they believe in, to fight for the ideals that they so passionately describe as they complain to each other in hushed tones or on anonymous message boards on the Internet, it will remain this way; and the grumbling will continue.
To quote a recent movie, "The government should fear its people, not the people fear its government". Government and commercial enterprise are supposed to provide a service for the people, with the people at the top of the food chain, but the people have let this lapse, and it will remain this way until they realise this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Continuation
Filesharing, bit torrent, P2P, TIVO, pirating and the like are all examples of people standing up for what they believe in.
It isn't realistic to see people do without as a protest nor is it reasonable to expect people to take up their arms and march to Madison Avenue (or their local cable/Sat provider).
People express their displeasure by not sending money to those who they are displeased with.
Movie theater attendance is down. Prices for snacks are up as is pre movie advertising.
TV shows are approaching 50% commericals and people are using TIVO andother means of circumventing the ads and freeing up their time for things they wish.
Music is hideously overpriced given that the standard methodology in releasing a CD is to have one or two radio worthy tracks and the rest crap filler. So, there is now a free and pay market to download just what one wants.
I would say the revolution is well underway and there is good money in providing people with ways to avoid what annoys them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: ad skipping
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Continuation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How About...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Ads
The other sad truth is that the company I work for, is not advertising. This means we only see the same people we always see when they need a product. We need new faces to grow business, and advertising is the only way to bring new customers in the store.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
farewell TiVo, good bye TV
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Charge me a small amount per show and have no ads.
If I can watch everything I want and have my monthly bill be the same or less, I will gladly sign up.
If not for the DRM, ITunes and the like would be great. At 99 cents per song that isn't a savings over the per song price for a CD, but since I don't normally want more than 1 or 2 songs from a CD I get all I want for $1-2 instead of $12-15. Works for me.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No FFWD with some DVRs
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How About...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RE: Anonymous Coward
Firstly, I must say it is enlightening to see a young person reading topics that are as politically, ethicly and philosophically heavy as this. I am proud, 'somerandomguy', that my comment has changed your opinion of the world, and I hope that you continue reading discussions such as this for a long time to come.
Perhaps it would be a more acceptable model for companies such as you listed to adopt a pay-per-view system, but then, who is to decide how much to charge for each item? As an example, with bulk production, items can be made, imported, transported and stocked for ~$0.80, yet retail for $2.00! How can this be seen as just?
Yes, filesharing, peer-to-peer and other similar concepts are examples of people taking action against such things, but they are so frought with danger - from viruses, spyware, copyright infringement, and even just the nature of some content that is added to those systems - that many people are afraid to use it!
Just last night, a friend of mine asked me to try and find some "Sailor Moon" episodes - a Japanese anime-style cartoon for children. When I ran the search, of approximately 15 files found, three quarters of them were pornographic!
Yes, advertisements are needed to promote even the existence of a company or its products/services, but where is the line drawn? Who determines the equilibrium between supporting a free service by commercial third-party advertisements, and making a profit at the expense of the public?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Continuation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Charge me a small amount per show and have no ads.
If I can watch everything I want and have my monthly bill be the same or less, I will gladly sign up.
The problem with that solution is that a teir service would be created. And we all know the tier that has shows with no ads would cost an arm and leg. This would also open the door to outlawing methods of skipping ads under the premise of "If you dont want ads then buy the proper service." And with that door open networks would flood channels with so many ads that tv shows will become even shorter.
Side note: Most 30min shows are ususally 20min of show and 10min of ads. Why is it that as shows get shorter ( to make room for more ads ) actors/actresses want more money for them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In the 1985 film Max Headroom: 20 Minutes into the Future and the subsequent 1987 science fiction television show Max Headroom, blipverts were a new high-intensity television commercial which had the consequence of overloading the nervous systems of certain viewers, causing their bodies to explode. In the original story, reporter Edison Carter exposed Network 23's efforts to create and broadcast them in his investigative affairs segment, "What I Wanna Know
Master Lock, which had already made the image of a padlock shot by a sharpshooter into a lasting advertising image with their ad in the Super Bowl in 1974, incorporated that video image, along with its logo, in a one-second-long television commercial in 1998.[1] It is not believed to have caused anyone to explode.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Some of the advertisers are embrasing this tech
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Continuation
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Continuation
Actually this year has seen an increase of Movie theater ticket sales for nearly each weekend compared to the same weekend last year. Last year experienced this same trend. Movie theaters have also expanded by building more theaters that include more screens. A local theater group called Megaplex theaters just built a new theater wtih 10 screens featuring digital projectors and all 20 theaters feature digital sound sound compatible with both THX and Dolby Digital. The evening price is only $7.50 a ticket, and it is only $5.25 or $5.50 before 6 p.m. You have not experienced a movie until you see it on a digital projector. I love going to the theater!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Continuation
"Movie theater attendance is down. Prices for snacks are up as is pre movie advertising"
Actually this year has seen an increase of Movie theater ticket sales for nearly each weekend compared to the same weekend last year. Last year experienced this same trend. Movie theaters have also expanded by building more theaters that include more screens. A local theater group called Megaplex theaters just built a new theater wtih 10 screens featuring digital projectors and all 20 theaters feature digital sound sound compatible with both THX and Dolby Digital. The evening price is only $7.50 a ticket, and it is only $5.25 or $5.50 before 6 p.m. You have not experienced a movie until you see it on a digital projector. I love going to the theater!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
another way to bypass commercials
As far as promos on the front of DVD's goes, as soon as the first one arrives that cannot skip the promos ends up in my house, it will get returned for refund since it won't play properly. I've pondered billing the releasing studio for air-time in my house as an alternative to returning the DVD to the store for a refund. Sure, I'll watch your promos, but it will cost you a buck each view. "creating a DVD that obligates me to watch commercials constitutes an agreement to pay for such viewing time in my residence"
and remember, tv is a multimedia technology, there's always the mute button. Billy Mays never airs in my home. That guy is rude as heck.
L
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bill Sez:
"By the way, if anyone here is in advertising or marketing, kill yourself. Just a little thought, I'm just trying to plant seeds, maybe one day they'll take root, I don't know. You do what you can. Kill yourself. Seriously though, if you are, do. Uhhhh, no really, there's no rationalization for what you do and you're Satan's little helper, okay? Kill yourselves, seriously. You're the ruiner of all things good. Seriously. This is not a joke. You're thinking "There's gonna be a joke comin', heheh-" there's no fucking joke coming. You are Satan's spawn, filling the world with violent garbage, you are fucked and you are fucking us, kill yourself. It's the only way to save your fuckin' soul. Kill yourself. Planting seeds. I know all the marketing people are going "He's doin a joke-" there's no joke here whatsoever. Suck a tailpipe, fuckin' hang yourself, borrow a gun from an NRA friend, I don't care how you do it, rid the world of your evil fuckin' machinations. Whatever, you know what I mean. I know what all the marketing people are thinking right now too: "Oh, he's going for that anti-marketing dollar, that's a good market, he's very smart." I am not doin' that, you fuckin evil scumbags. "Ohh, you know what Bill's doin now, he's going for that righteous indignation dollar, that's a big dollar. Lot of people are feeling that indignation - we've done research. Huge market, he's doing a good thing." Goddamnit I'm not doing that, you scumbags. QUIT PUTTING A GODDAMNED DOLLAR SIGN ON EVERYTHING ON THIS FUCKIN' PLANET."
Ay-men to that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]