For A New Business Model To Work, It Probably Shouldn't Annoy Users
from the just-a-suggestion dept
In an age where avoiding commercials has been a big part of the pitch of certain businesses, such as TiVo and satellite radio (less so now than when they launched), does it really make sense to base an entire business on adding in intrusive commercials where they didn't exist before? Yesterday at DEMOfall, Lirix presented their software for inserting audio advertisements at the end of songs that people listen to on their computer or mobile device. The idea, of course, is that it represents a different kind of business model for content producers, similar to what Universal Music announced a few weeks back. However, like that system, there are plenty of questions raised by this offering. Even ignoring the proud announcement that this idea is "patented," the company also claims that it will put these ads on music that was "pirated" or loaded onto a device. That, of course, hides the fact that they don't actually determine if your music is authorized or not -- they just put ads on it. So if you were to upload legally made MP3s from CDs you bought or downloaded legally, they'll still put the ads in. They claimed that they pay royalties to companies even on "pirated music" because it still represents legitimate ad inventory -- though that may be news to the person who legitimately bought a song on CD and simply transferred the song to their device for personal use.In other words, if you do have a lot of your own music, why would you ever put it into this system that's just going to dump ads on it? It adds back in the very thing many people are trying to avoid in terms of intrusive advertising. It may offer up a new business model to the record labels, but for a business model to work it needs to actually involve providing something consumers want -- and that doesn't include (as they showed in the demo) putting an ad for a dating service after any song that has a theme of "loneliness" in the song. I spoke to the folks at their Demo booth, and they suggest that the real power isn't just in ads, but in "value added content." That's a much more interesting idea, but it still seems tied back to ads. They kept comparing the model to traditional radio, but traditional radio is what a lot of people are trying to get away from. However, as an example, they said their system can look at all the songs you have included on your phone, and then automatically recommend and put in another song you might like... with an advertisement (of course). There is some value in dynamically adding in songs that you might like, but if it must involve an additional advertisement, it's hard to see too many people excitedly buying into it -- especially when they can just listen to all their music sans ads already.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I wonder
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Otherwise, these guys can kiss my commercial free white ass.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Quick question
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sign Me Up!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This and P2P
This benefits the P2P companies, end users and record labels that get a cut on the ad revenew, even if the song is pirated.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This and P2P
NOT.
for a p2p netowrk to actually do something, someone must use it.
Why would anyone use this p2p network to download music they still wont own, when it would be far more annoying than to use ANY OTHER p2p network.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This and P2P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Bonjou"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
hmmmm
I heard something about CBS putting ads on Eggs? Search it up..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
it might be beneficial ...
1) If it's my music, leave it the hell alone
2) Don't dare track or keep record of what I have on my computer or what I listen to on my portable device
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pandora
[ link to this | view in thread ]
...suggested listening?
As #9 said, even if they did try to incorporate this into something that would ACTUALLY affect people who didn't want it, there would be a patch available to circumvent it in less than a few hours.
The idea is novelty, at best. People will try it for a few hours to see what "interesting" things it does, then people will avoid it forever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I say the idea is brilliant. Then the RIAA will open a music store where every song costs more than the competition and has ads included.
Does anyone think they wouldn't go for it?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Patented?
EtG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re: patented?
"a system that appends or prepends audio advertising to static audio media downloaded or uploaded through an ip network via desktop machine"
this clears other patents by
A) static media-clears net-radio stations
B) ip network-p2p, server client, whatever, not peripherals
C)desktop machine-not traditionally defined radio broadcast spectrum
[ link to this | view in thread ]
At least they patented it
Get a brain trust together and come up with several different ways of doing DRM -- and patent them. Seek injunctions and refuse to license the patent.
Come up with all sorts of ways of inserting advertisement all over the place -- and repeat the patent process.
Who said the patent system wasn't useful?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
kiss my ....
Frankly go ahead and try to sick your BS on the "backbone" of a P2P app.. lets try it out on limewire...
oh wait, you obvriously dont understand the real concept of P2P or rather the technology that makes it work.
It's called TCP/IP and yeah try to send me your adi-invested music.. in 2 weeks there will be a hash code tracker application that will subject mp3's to scans for ads. Any mp3 song found with an ad will be cleaned
or quarantined.. it would be a free download...
Sure its a great idea.. let me get my patent lawyer on the phone and put in an order for the product "mp3-clean"
oh wait, let me order the domain name too!
mp3adscanner.com
mp3adscan.com
mp3clean.us
mp3cleaner.us
mp3cleaner.org
wow the possibilties are endless..
any programmers looking for work? want to design a proggie.. .pst :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I think it's an interesting idea...
Sounds like a decent trade. As long as the ad is less than 30 seconds I guess. Even so, I can always reedit and remove the ad in less than a minute and still have just my song.
I'd encourage this to see what happens. Right now they give us nothing. If each song has a parasitic ad, it may work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I always skip through songs before they are done...
This is yet another attempt at reinventing advertising...
When was the last time something new was invented?
We went from the wheel, to a cart, to a train, to a car, to an airplane... Horray for the inventor of the airplane... unfortunaltely, that's where creativity ended. Now we try to come up with hybrids, and clean fuel, etc... but no one tries to invent something NEW...
Humans are getting dumber by the minute.
Stop reinventing chit that was invented already!
shesh...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Pandora
http://www.pandora.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: #20
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:#21
[ link to this | view in thread ]